Tier 1 Law 1.12 Dui – gtg

Dram Shop Evidence – Serving Size
Dram Shop Evidence – Signs of Obvious Intoxication
Dram Shop Evidence – Changes In Behavior
Dram Shop Evidence – Eye Witness Testimony
Dram Shop Evidence – Arresting Office Testimony
Dram Shop Evidence – Toxicologist Testimony
Dram Shop Evidence – Proximity
———————-

Serving Sizes of Alcohol and Rate of Consumption

Is the Bar Promoting the Over-Service of Alcohol With Novelty-Sized or Oversized Drinks?

We have been fighting for drunk driving accident victims` rights for over 20 years. Call to discuss your case.

A typical serving of alcohol is 12 oz. of beer; 5 oz. of wine; or 1.5 oz. of hard liquor. However many bars will have novelty oversized glasses and this can lead to over-serving and overconsumption. Bars that over-serve either in the frequency of servings or in the size of their glasses are encouraging the over-service of alcohol. This can lead to a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the over-served and now intoxicated person getting into a vehicle and causing a drunken accident to a third party.

Custom Drink Sizes

Fiestas, parties, and special occasions are all times when a bar may have a novelty promotion and could over serve by having larger than normal glasses. There are good warning signs wait staff can use to judge whether someone has been over-served. The best way to judge whether someone is intoxicated and to prevent them from being over-served is to pay attention to the customer and how they behaved when they first enter the bar. By taking notice of their mannerisms the server can create a baseline to judge the customer and then compare that to any changes in behavior after the customer starts ordering drinks. It is good practice for the server to monitor the customer’s behavior during the course of the drinking and to watch for warning signs. Warning signs such as slurred speech, difficulty walking, and changes in behavior.

Standard Drinking Sizes Recommended

In situations like fraternity parties, there won’t be any serving staff or anyone trained to watch for the subtle signs of overconsumption, and yet that won’t stop the varied drink sizes that will encourage over serving. At least in a typical restaurant or bar, you are more likely to find the standard serving sizes. The recommended serving sizes are: beer = 12 ounces, wine = 5 ounces, distilled spirit = 1.5 ounces. But at a college party, you’re more likely to find everything from larger than normal plastic cups to beer bongs and keg stands. These novelty items encourage the rapid consumption of alcohol in a short span of time in order to induce a more powerful alcoholic “buzz”.

Alcohol should be served safely and responsibly. The standard drink sizes are designed to do provide an adequate amount of alcohol in a reasonable amount. When bars, restaurants, fraternities, and other establishments deviate from the normal sizes for servings of alcohol by use of novelty glass sizes or other unorthodox methods of drinking this encourages extreme intoxication by consuming larger than normal amounts of alcohol in a shorter than a normal time period. By negligently varying the rate of consumption these establishments become liable under dram shop laws. The reason for this is that by negligently varying the serving sizes of alcohol they are enabling severely intoxicated persons to leave their establishments and become a danger to other innocent parties on the roadway.

If you or someone you love has been over-served and injured to the negligence of a bar, pub, restaurant, or another drinking establishment, contact Our Law Office. When drinking establishments choose to over-serve and ignore the recommended serving sizes of alcohol it can lead to serious injury or death to the person who was served and to other innocent third parties. Don’t assume if you were the one who was overserved that you are entirely to blame. Under the law, you may have a judicial recourse. In order to know your legal options under the law, contact our attorneys at Our Law Office.

=================================gtg

Physical Clues of Obvious Intoxication

Texas Bartenders Must be Able to Recognize Obvious Intoxication in Order to Comply With Dram Shop Laws

To the casual observer, a bartender’s job might not seem that difficult. He or she has to learn different drink combinations and put up with the occasional belligerent customer, but all in all the job just doesn’t look that hard.

But the reality is that a bartender’s job is very tough. Not only do bartenders have to please their customers, but they also have to balance that with making sure they obey the law and not serve their patrons past the point of intoxication. If a customer is allowed to leave the premises while drunk, gets behind the wheel of his or her car, and then injures or kills someone, the bartender and establishment where the person became intoxicated will face a substantial amount of liability due to Texas’ dram shop laws.

An important part of the hospitality industry is making sure that customers are safe. Sometimes that means a bartender or waitperson will have the unpleasant task of cutting someone off who has become overly inebriated. There are many servers who find this task extremely difficult because they don’t want to get into an argument with someone who has had too much, or in other more nefarious times, they do not want to stop the growing tab. Sometimes, the person being cut off can be extremely intimidating, other times they can be downright hostile. Some servers and bartenders may even try to avoid this situation because they fear the possible repercussions from the bar owner.

But in order to make sure the general public is kept as safe as possible, sometimes there are hard choices that simply have to be made. If a bartender or server is truly responsible, he or she will fight through the anxiety that comes with cutting off a drunken customer and do what has to be done. Someone’s life could be on the line.

At Our Law Office, our attorneys have represented victims of drunk driving accidents for the last two decades. We have seen, in far too many instances, what can happen when a bartender or server shirks his or her responsibility to ensure the safety of the general public. If you have been injured or lost a loved one due to a drunk driving accident, please call Our Law Office (toll-free) for a confidential and free consultation. We can help you see that justice is done against a bar, restaurant, or other alcohol-serving establishments that contribute to an accident by serving a person to the point of intoxication.

The Signs of Intoxication

In order to be able to legally serve alcohol in Texas, an establishment must obtain a Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission license. In order to keep that license, the bartenders and servers working for that establishment must undergo extensive training in how to spot an intoxicated customer.

People are, of course, affected differently by alcohol. Certain amounts of alcohol will affect one person more than another person. These differing factors also have an effect on the signs of intoxication that a person will exhibit.

There are several obvious signs of intoxication, however, that a bartender or server should be able to readily spot. Failure to do so can lead to a devastating accident that can result in severe injuries or fatalities. And when this happens, again, the server and the alcohol-serving establishment can face substantial liability.

If, for example, a person is exhibiting poor coordination or motor control after consuming alcohol, that person cannot be left alone, and definitely cannot be allowed to operate a motor vehicle. A sure sign that someone has become intoxicated is when he or she sways or stumbles, or is having such a problem with depth perception that he or she drops things repeatedly or has a hard time picking them up.

Other signs of probable intoxication include:

A customer spilling a drink by missing his or her mouth with a glass.
Deliberate or slow movements.
Standing with his or her feet wide apart in order to maintain balance.
Leaning against a structure for support.
Fumbling with a wallet or with money.

Again, these are just some of the more obvious signs of intoxication for which servers or bartenders must constantly be on the lookout. If this was not done, and you were hurt in an accident involving an intoxicated driver as a result, then you must call an attorney immediately in order to have the best chance possible at obtaining compensation. Please call Our Law Office (toll-free) to learn more.

===========================gtg

Dram Shop Evidence: Changes in Behavior

The Bar’s Legal Obligation to Recognizing Signs of Obvious Intoxication, Including Changes in Behavior

Did You Know?

We have been fighting for drunk driving accident victims` rights for over 20 years. Call to discuss your case.

You don’t necessarily need a degree in human behavior to spot the most obvious physical signs of intoxication from a customer in an alcohol-serving establishment. In all cases though, several key behavioral patterns should be detectable by trained bar staff, in order to stop the over-service of alcohol.

While visible indicators of intoxication are easy to see, such as impairment of motor functions, an inability to judge depth (constantly dropping items and being unable to pick them up), etc., there are many other more subtle signs that can be very easy for the layperson to miss. However, a server or bartender must be able to spot these subtleties in order to make sure an intoxicated customer is not continued service and then allowed to drive.

As with obvious signs of intoxication, these more subtle signs can indicate someone is dangerously inebriated and will be a danger to himself, herself, or others. Failure to see these signs can lead to an accident that causes devastating injuries and fatalities, leaving the alcohol-serving establishment and its employees exposed to crippling liability. If you have been the victim of such an accident, it is imperative that you enlist the assistance of an experienced attorney as quickly as you can so that you will have the best possible chance of obtaining compensation.

At Our Law Office, our dram shop attorneys have represented clients in these kinds of cases for the last two decades. We have the knowledge and experience you will need to be able to recover financially so you can get on with the task of recovery from the accident that has resulted in such a drastic upheaval in your life. If you would like to speak with one of our lawyers, call us (toll-free) for a confidential and free consultation.

Changes in Behavior Due to Intoxication

Even if some signs of intoxication are more subtle than others, this does not give a bartender or server the built-in excuse of, “he didn’t look drunk to me” as any sort of defense. Servers and bartenders cannot use this because they undergo extensive Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission training on spotting the signs of inebriation – both obvious and subtle. This training is mandatory if a bar, restaurant, or other alcohol-serving establishment is to keep its TABC license.

If a bartender or server waits for more telltale signs before refusing further service, then it is already too late. Studies show that a customer’s blood alcohol concentration does not reach its highest level until 15-30 minutes after the person has stopped drinking. The time to cut a person off from service is before that person is showing the signs of obvious intoxication.

These subtle signs are more a function of behavior changes rather than physical impairment. Knowledge is obviously key to being able to make accurate observations. Servers must be aware that the larger a person is, the less that person will likely be affected per each ounce of alcohol consumed. Men, in general, are affected by alcohol less than women, and liquor causes blood alcohol concentration levels to rise higher, and at a faster rate, than wine or beer.

Most people feel less inhibited after drinking alcohol; usually, people talk at an increasingly louder volume, become friendlier, and are also very relaxed. However, they can also experience sudden mood swings and become visibly emotional. If a person who is normally reserved all of a sudden begins speaking loudly, a typically quiet person decides to buy a round for the house, or a typically social person becomes quiet, these are all signs of probable intoxication.

The higher a person’s blood-alcohol level rises, the less rational and reasonable they typically become. People may start consuming alcohol at a faster rate, increase their intake by ordering doubles, or become very “generous” and start ordering drinks for complete strangers. If a person smokes, he or she may light the wrong end or light one while another one is still burning in an ashtray. Eyes become unfocused and glassy, with dilated pupils. Speech becomes slightly slurred or noticeably deliberate. People who become inebriated also commonly utter irrational statements, or exhibit obnoxious or otherwise anti-social behavior.

Many others, as you already know, can “hold their liquor” better than others. But just because they are able to do so does not mean they are not intoxicated. One significant tip-off is a heavy smell of alcohol on a person’s breath, while another is redness on the extremities.

Also, the more the typical person imbibes, the more inappropriate his or her behavior may become. Signs include overly flirtatious behavior, off-color jokes or vulgar language, or calling for a drinking game of some sort. On the opposite end of the spectrum, however, some intoxicated customers become more sullen, not wanting to communicate other than ordering a drink or offering no response to questions or a slow response. Others will either show no reaction to spilling a drink on themselves, or they will be slow in reacting.

While these signs would be easy for most patrons in a noisy and crowded bar to overlook, a server has to be on the lookout for them. Again, failure to do so can result in a catastrophic accident that can lead to a debilitating injury or death. Servers and bartenders have a responsibility by law to help protect the general public from drunken patrons – if they do not meet this responsibility, they must be forced to face the consequences. If you have been injured in a drunk driving accident or lost a loved one, you will need a skilled and aggressive lawyer who will make all of those whose negligence led to your suffering be forced to face justice. Please call Our Law Office (toll-free) if you would like to find out how our attorneys can help you obtain compensation for the suffering you have been forced to endure.

========================gtg

Dram Shop Evidence: Eye Witness Testimony

How Eye Witness Testimony Can Affect Your Dram Shop Accident Case

If you’re pursuing compensation from a negligent drinking establishment under Texas dram shop laws after being injured or having a loved one killed in an accident by a drunken driver, then you’re going to need to be able to prove the bar or restaurant ignored its duties to serve the patron responsibly. Drinking establishments are forbidden to sell alcohol to people who are past the point of intoxication, are compelled to keep an eye out for customers who have become too intoxicated, and then stop service when they do. Those who ignore these duties can be held liable for people who are injured or killed in accidents with drunken drivers they over-serve under an area of Texas statutes known as dram shop laws. To actually prove your case after being injured or losing a loved one in an accident with a drunken driver, however, you will need to be able to prove your right to compensation.

At Our Law Office, we’ve been helping Texans hurt by drunken drivers for more than two decades, and we want you to understand what it takes to prove a dram shop claim.

Eye Witness Accounts are Critical

To be able to successfully seek compensation from a bar or restaurant that negligently over-served an intoxicated driver who did you harm, you’re going to be able to prove that the drinking establishment served enough alcohol to the driver to have gotten him or her drunk and that the drunken driver was displaying enough outward signs of obvious intoxication that a reasonable server should have been able to detect he or she was drunk. These signs of drunkenness can include slurred speech, loss of coordination, dramatic mood swings, and loss of control of bodily functions, just to name a few.

While the first stipulation can often be proven by consulting credit or debit card records for the driver or sales receipts from the drinking establishment, the second requirement will need some form or first-person corroboration, which means you’re going to need and or want witnesses. Common witnesses who can be called upon to testify in dram shop cases include:

Companions of the Drunken Driver – While some hardcore alcoholics drink by themselves, most people like to drink socially. As a result, when drunken drivers are over-served by bars or restaurants, there are often friends with them who can attest to just how intoxicated the drunken driver appeared to be before he or she left the drinking establishment. An experienced lawyer can find these people by consulting phone records and social network pages. When most people go out drinking with friends, they make plans, and that means calling, texting, or using Facebook beforehand. Our attorneys can track these people down and get an honest account of just how intoxicated their friend appeared to be.

Other Bar Patrons – Many bars and restaurants have regular customers. While a friend of the drunken driver may appear to be biased, the testimony of another patron carries far more cache in court, for he or she has no reason to side with the victim of the accident or the drunken driver over the bar. In many cases, our attorneys have found that drunken drivers were more than just a little obviously intoxicated before they left the bar, and many of their behavior is so unorthodox that it leaves an impression on the other patrons in the establishment. In addition, regular bar patrons may be able to help establish that the drinking establishment or service makes a habit of violating TABC regulations by regularly continuing to serve patrons who are blatantly intoxicated.

Witnesses to the Accident – Often times innocent bystanders observe the intoxicated behavior either before or after the accident. Nowadays, virtually everyone has a cell phone, and when motorists see someone driving drunk, they often call in the behavior to 911. If the apparently drunken driver then gets into a wreck, these people can reinforce the notion that the driver was obviously intoxicated. After all, their drunken driving was noticeable, or no call would have been made. In other instances, witnesses may be at the scene after the accident and observe the driver either stinking of alcohol or acting in ways that only an intoxicated person would. These eyewitnesses could include police officers who responded to the accident and arrested the drunken driver.

Did You Know?

Our drunk driver accident attorneys have won thousands of cases. Call us today to discuss your case.

In order to find the eyewitnesses that you will need to prove a drinking establishment over-served the driver who injured you or killed your loved one, you’re going to need to act quickly to find an experienced and competent attorney to conduct your investigation. Particularly when it comes to finding patrons of the bar, an attorney needs to act fast. Moreover, when it comes to people who drink, your lawyer needs to act quickly to get their statements on record before they begin to forget what happened. Alcohol consumption affects memory loss.

With over two decades of experience, the dram shop lawyers at Our Law Office can help you find the eyewitnesses you need to prove your personal injury or wrongful death claim against a bar or restaurant. If you’d like to find out how we can help, call us any time for a free consultation (toll free).

==================gtg

Dram Shop Evidence

The Importance of Police Officer Testimony in a Texas Dram Shop Lawsuit

In any civil lawsuit resulting from a drunk driving accident, the testimony of the arresting officer can be extremely important.

Whenever you’ve been hurt or someone else has been killed in a car wreck with a drunken driver, you can seek remedy from the drinking establishment where the driver became intoxicated provided it violated the guidelines set up for dispensing alcohol in the state of Texas by the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission. This is called a dram shop claim. You can even pursue a dram shop claim against a drinking establishment after being assaulted by an intoxicated patron, but proving a case like this is extremely challenging and can usually only be accomplished if the drunken customer has a history of starting fights in that particular bar. When filing a dram shop lawsuit after a drunken-driving accident, though, it doesn’t replace a personal injury or wrongful death lawsuit filed against the driver, but will usually be filed in conjunction with action against the driver.

Dram shop lawsuits play an important role in reducing the number of drunken driving accidents in Texas by giving drinking establishments significant monetary incentives for serving alcohol responsibly. Moreover, dram shop lawsuits enable the drunken driving victim to have a better chance of securing the compensation he or she needs to remedy the damage done by the accident, for not all drunken drivers will be able to afford the damages on their own.

In Texas, bars and restaurants are expected to keep an eye on patrons as they serve them. When someone becomes obviously intoxicated, the drinking establishment is supposed to cut off service and take action to make sure the patron will not be driving. Thus, proving the drinking establishment failed in this respect is an essential part of every dram shop lawsuit. To be successful, you must be able to convince the court that the bartenders or wait staff of the bar or restaurant should have been able to detect the driver’s drunkenness before he or she got behind the wheel.

Proving the Drunken Driver Appeared Intoxicated

Proving that a drunken driver who caused an accident was actually intoxicated isn’t that challenging. When a vehicular accident results in injury or death and alcohol is suspected to have played a role, the state of Texas calls for all of the drivers involved to be subjected to mandatory blood tests with or without the driver’s consent. However, after being injured by a drunken driver, it’s not enough just to prove that the driver was intoxicated. You’re going to have to prove that he or she was so intoxicated that a reasonable person should have noticed that he or she was drunk. For this purpose, the testimony of the arresting officer plays an integral role.

How the Officer’s Testimony Can Help

Consumption of alcohol has a negative effect on both physical behavior and appearance, as well as, mental ability. When someone is intoxicated, his or her physical appearance may be altered by blood-shot eyes, dilated pupils, and the smell of alcohol on the breath or in severe cases seeping out of the body in sweat. His or her behavior may be affected by erratic driving, slurred speech, and the inability to balance properly when walking or standing. Thus, the testimony of the officer who made the arrest can help demonstrate how the servers in the drinking establishment should have been able to detect outward signs of intoxication in the patron before continuing to serve him or her and then letting him or her drive home.

For example, a police officer responds to a call reporting a collision at an intersection. When he arrives at the scene, he discovers one of the drivers is still in his car severely injured, while the other exhibits no outward signs of injury but is hunched over on the sidewalk, vomiting. Paramedics arrive to tend to the injured man, so the officer questions the other driver. When the officer approaches this man, the police officer is struck by the strong stench of alcohol rising from the mess at his feet. In response to the presence of the officer, the man rights himself, revealing bloodshot eyes as the light from the streetlamp above hits his face. Although the man denies being intoxicated when asked, he slurs his words as he answers the officer’s questions, and he sways back and forth while standing, like he’s a small tree blowing gently in the breeze. The driver claims to be coming from a movie, but he’s wearing a wristband from a local club. When asked to perform roadside sobriety tests, the suspected intoxicated driver performs very poorly, so the officer decides to have his Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) tested, revealing the man to be well over the legal limit of .08 BAC.

In this instance, many of the indicators of intoxication that the officer observed should have been noticeable to the servers of the club where he had been drinking – slurring words, bloodshot eyes, inability to balance, and the stench of alcohol on his breath. Moreover, in this particular example, the presence of the wristband, color-coded by day, demonstrates that the driver was in the particular club.

While some habitual alcoholics can conceal the effect intoxication has on them, virtually everyone will show some outward sign of intoxication. A police officer who can testify to observing these signs can be just as helpful in establishing a claim after a bar fight as an accident. If you were attacked by a drunken patron who has a history of physically abusing others in a certain drinking establishment, then you may have just as valid of a drunken driving claim, as if he or she hit you with a Ford instead of a fist.

In most cases, you will need the assistance of an experienced dram shop attorney in order to be able to make the most of the arresting officer’s eye-witness account of the driver’s obvious intoxication. First, and most importantly, you need someone who knows that the police officer must be added to the list of expert witnesses in order to be able to testify about the intoxicated driver at all. This sounds like a simple step, but you don’t want to know how many cases are ruined because the police officer can only testify to the facts of the arrest and not his or her observations about the suspect.

Second, only an experienced lawyer knows all the questions to ask the arresting officer that could help prove the obvious intoxication of the driver. You don’t want to leave any stones unturned in the investigation or make the mistake of turning to an attorney who specializes in some other facet of the law and doesn’t know what questions to ask.

At Our Law Office, we’ve spent more than two decades litigating dram shop cases, and we’ve questioned and deposed law enforcement from the Police Department, the Department of Public Safety, and all over the state of Texas. We know how to draw out the arresting officer’s testimony that can help you prove the driver who injured you or killed your loved one was noticeably intoxicated – if the facts of the case merit that conclusion. Call us now for a free consultation (toll-free) to learn more about how we can help or just to ask any questions you may have about the testimony of law enforcement in your case.

=================gtg

Dram Shop Evidence: Toxicologist Testimony

How the Expert Testimony of a Toxicologist Can Help You in a Texas Dram Shop Accident Lawsuit

Did You Know?

Our attorneys have won hundreds of drunk driver accident cases. Call us today to discuss your case.

When you’ve been injured or someone in your family has been killed in a drunken-driving accident, you may be able to seek damages from the drinking establishment who enabled the driver to become intoxicated, as well as, the driver himself. This can be critical to your ability to recover remedies commensurate with the suffering that has been inflicted upon you, for many drunken drivers lack the assets to cover the damage they cause. Pursuing compensation from the negligent drinking establishment permits you to go after someone with sufficient solvency to cover the harm that has actually been done to you.

However, you’re going to need to be able to demonstrate that the driver was in fact drunk at the time of the accident to have a cause of action against either the driver or the drinking establishment who over-served him or her. In fact, when filing a dram shop claim, it’s not enough just to prove that the driver was intoxicated when he or she caused the accident. Rather, you must be able to convince jurors that the driver’s level of intoxication was so obvious that a reasonable server within the bar should have noticed it and stopped selling him or her alcoholic drinks. In Texas, bars and restaurants’ servers are required to observe when patrons have become noticeably drunk and can be held responsible for not taking action to protect the patron and the public when someone has become obviously intoxicated and continues to imbibe.

At Our Law Office, our attorneys have been helping Texans litigate dram shop cases for more than 22 years, so we know how important the testimony of a toxicologist can be both for demonstrating the drunkenness of the driver when he or she caused an accident and when he or she left the drinking establishment. We want you to understand why this is.

Why You Need a Toxicologist

When a drunk driver causes injury or death to another person in an accident, Texas state law requires mandatory blood testing to be done on all of the drivers involved in order to assess their level of intoxication. This blood testing, though, usually isn’t administered for at least an hour – and sometimes longer – after the accident has taken place. Due to the time elapsed, the driver’s Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) when it is tested is not going to be what it was when he or she got into the accident or what it was when he or she left the drinking establishment. As a result, drunken drivers can sometimes argue that they were legally intoxicated when the blood was taken two hours after the accident but not when the accident occurred. Whereas, the drinking establishment can debate its negligence by suggesting the driver’s BAC indicates he or she only became noticeably intoxicated after leaving the bar.

Responding to these arguments is where the testimony of a toxicologist comes into play. Toxicologists study the effect of chemicals on animals. In legal circles, toxicologists are most often used to testify regarding the effects of alcohol and drugs on humans. At Our Law Office, we bring in toxicologists as consultants to examine the findings of blood or breath tests conducted on alleged drunken drivers. In some cases, a driver’s level of intoxication won’t be readily apparent based upon the BAC test results. These experts can help pinpoint what a failed test actually means and how intoxicated the driver actually was at the time the accident occurred and in some cases when he or she left the drinking establishment.

For example, a driver drinks a large amount of alcohol at a bar – enough to make him obviously drunk, but he doesn’t go directly home after leaving the bar, instead taking a woman to her apartment first. On the way home from the woman’s house three hours after leaving the bar, he gets into a wreck and injures another driver. When the police take his BAC, it’s .10 percent, which is over the legal limit of .08 percent. On the other hand, .10 percent BAC is low enough that the drinking establishment could argue that the man wasn’t obviously intoxicated when left the bar. Our attorneys would bring in a forensic toxicologist to examine the BAC test results. From the woman’s testimony and that of the drunken driver, along with the time the man closed out and paid his tab at the bar, we know approximately what time the man left the bar. Factoring in this information with the man’s physical characteristics (body size, speed of metabolism), the toxicologist could estimate the actual BAC level of the man when he left the bar, calling into question the drinking establishment’s claim that he was not obviously drunk.

Or in another situation, a driver falsely claims he had a few shots right before getting into a car and causing an accident, when in fact he had been drinking for quite some time. While the BAC test taken later showed that he was intoxicated, the driver claims he wasn’t really drunk when the accident occurred and only became so after digesting the liquor while waiting for the blood test. A toxicologist can again take into account the driver’s weight and metabolism and then estimate whether or not this information is accurate or the driver could have been intoxicated when the accident occurred.

Of note, a toxicologist needs to have more than his or her opinion to be effective. First and foremost, the toxicologist must be schooled in toxicology and the accompanying fields of chemistry and biology. While a bachelor’s degree permits anyone to claim that he or she is an expert in court, graduate and doctoral degrees are far more compelling to a jury.

However, just understanding toxicology isn’t sufficient to be an effective forensic toxicologist in a courtroom. No, the toxicologist must be able to convince the jury that he or she is correct in his or her assessments, and this requires both the heir of authority and strong speaking skills. The heir of authority can be gained with the proper credentials and consulting history, but the ability to communicate depends upon the personality of the toxicologist. You need someone who is an effective speaker and not just a scientist with no interpersonal skills.

Just using Google or the phone book, you can find a toxicologist, but you won’t have any idea of how this person can actually perform in court. At Our Law Office, we’ve been consulting with toxicologists for more than two decades, and we’ve found some we can depend upon to be both accurate and able to sway jurors into believing their determinations. To discover more about how forensic toxicology can affect dram shop cases or to learn how we can help you get the assistance of a trustworthy toxicologist, call us now (toll free).

==================gtg

How Proximity Plays Into Dram Shop Liability

The Negligent Bar or Drinking Establishment Will Attempt to Use Proximity (Time and Distance) to Skirt Liability

When arguing dram shop liability, that is, the liability of a bar for over-serving a recipient who then causes harm to himself or others, a plaintiff will have many obstacles that must be overcome. Most of these will be in regard to proving that the recipient was (a.) drinking at the defendant’s bar, (b.) that the defendant over-served the recipient to such an extent that the recipient presented a clear and present danger to both himself and others, and (c.) that the recipient’s intoxication was, indeed, the proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injuries.

As your attorneys work to establish the liability of the defendant bar, one of the significant factors is “proximity.” There are arguments made in relation to both temporal (time) proximity as well as geographical proximity (distance). Proximity can be a factor that either helps establish the liability of the defendant, or it can be a factor that the defendant uses against you.

Using a Proximity-Based Argument to Your Advantage

As we stated above, the plaintiff has the burden of establishing several key elements in order to have a successful dram shop case. There are numerous “canned” defenses that bars will use to defeat a dram shop claim. Often times, the proximity of the injurious or fatal accident to the bar can help the plaintiff proactively overcome many of these arguments.

For example, our firm litigated a case where an intoxicated patron of a restaurant pulled out of the restaurant’s parking lot and struck another vehicle, killing the driver of that vehicle. In that particular case, the proximity of the accident scene to the restaurant – the source of the alcohol – was such that the defendants were not able to use several of the arguments that they typically like to use.

For instance:

They could not argue that the recipient had time to consume alcohol elsewhere. This is a common argument that bars will use, the logic of which follows this basic format, “Yes, the recipient drank at our bar, yes we violated the alcohol service rules established by the TABC, and yes, we were negligent in doing so. However, since a significant amount of time passed between our act of negligence and the accident, we do not feel that we were the proximate cause of the accident. Because, after all, how do we know the recipient did not drink elsewhere after leaving our establishment?”

They could not argue that the recipient was not yet showing signs of obvious intoxication. In some instances, a bar may over-serve a patron, but the patron leaves the bar before the intoxication “sets in,” so to speak. In such an event, the patron may be half an hour down the road before their intoxication is apparent. Under those circumstances, the bar may argue that they are not liable because they never had an opportunity to observe the recipient’s intoxication. But when the accident happens practically on the bar or restaurant’s doorstep, the only logical conclusion is that the intoxication set in on the bar’s premises and should have been observed.

In short, the closer in both time and distance that the accident happens in relation to the genesis of the alcohol consumption, the easier it will be for the plaintiff to show that the defendant is liable for the subsequent injuries.

How Proximity Can Hurt Your Case

One of the arguments the alcohol-serving establishment – the defendant in your dram shop personal injury or wrongful death case – will try to make is that the customer who was over-served, and who caused the drunk-driving accident, was so far from the establishment at the time of that accident that you cannot pin his or her intoxication on that establishment.

This “proximity factor” argument can be a very difficult one to overcome, so you will need an experienced attorney who can defeat that argument and convince the court that the defendant should be held liable for the role it played in the accident that led to your suffering.

For example, say a man becomes intoxicated in a bar. The man lives more than three hours from the bar. Somehow he makes it nearly all the way home before he hits another vehicle with his car and severely injures the driver. While the bar was the one that over-served the man, it will argue it did not contribute to his accident because he was more than 150 miles away when the accident took place. The establishment would argue that the man could have easily stopped someplace else along his route to consume alcohol. He could have stopped at a convenience store or another bar, and those establishments should be held liable instead.

This is obviously an extreme example; in the vast majority of drunk-driving cases, the accident takes place very close to the establishment that over-served the intoxicated driver. However, it is used to illustrate the point that a skilled defense lawyer will try and use arguments that you never even thought of in order to help his or her client escape responsibility for its negligence.

There is no tried and true formula to counter a defendant’s proximity argument; the farther away an accident takes place from the establishment that over-served the drunk driver, the harder it will be to win your case. Again, in order to overcome this argument you will need to have the help of a lawyer who not only has experience in this type of case, but also a track record of success. What an experienced dram shop lawyer will do is investigate and research all of the important elements in your case. A proactive approach is necessary when dealing with a defendant’s proximity-based argument.

For instance, if the defendant argues the way we illustrated in the above example, we would search for witnesses who observed the intoxicated driver driving recklessly at points between the bar and the accident scene. Additionally, we could have the ECM (Engine Control Module) of the intoxicated driver’s car examined, which, in some cases, can prove that the car was running for an extended amount of time, thereby showing that the intoxicated driver did not stop elsewhere to consume alcohol.

At Our Law Office, we have litigated dram shop cases for the last two decades. We have the skill and investigatory acumen required to make sure you have the evidence you will need to convince the court of the liability of the alcohol-serving establishment. If you would like to speak with one of our attorneys to learn more in regard to how we may be able to help, please call Our Law Office (toll-free).

=====================gtg

Tier 1 Law 1.11 dui cases – gtg

Related Articles

Dram Shop Overview
Intro to Dram Shop
Difference Between 1st Party and 3rd Party Claims
Dram Shop Statute of Limitations
Litigating Dram Shop Cases
Evidence
Spoliation of Evidence
Dram Shop Evidence – TABC BAC Chart
Dram Shop Evidence – Quantity Served

A dram shop or dramshop is a term that describes a bar, tavern, or similar commercial establishment where alcoholic beverages are sold. Traditionally, it referred to a shop where spirits were sold by the dram, a small unit of liquid.
—————-

Personal Injury Lawyers – Drunk Driver Accident Attorney

Our Attorneys Can Help You and Your Family Following a Serious Injury Accident With a Drunken Driver

Were you aware that you can sue both a drunken driver and the drinking establishment that over-served him if you’ve been injured in a drunk driving accident? When you bring a lawsuit against a drinking establishment, this is called a dram shop case, and this right stems from a section of the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Code.

What is a Dram Shop Case?

A dram shop case is a liquor liability case that allows you to sue bars, restaurants, clubs, and other establishments that serve alcohol under very specific conditions whereby they break rules regarding the service of alcohol set forth by the TABC.

What is the Concept Behind Dram Shop Laws?

Many years ago, the Texas state legislature recognized that drunken driving accidents and other intoxicated injuries are often the result of bars breaking the rules of safe alcohol service set forth by the TABC. Prior to the codification of the Dram Shop Act in 1987, the victims of drunken driving accidents could theoretically sue bars under a general negligence-based theory of liability, but our lawmakers decided this issue needed to be codified into law. The creation of the Dram Shop Act limited the injured party’s ability to sue bars but wasn’t necessarily a bad thing for plaintiffs. While the Dram Shop Act provided bars protection from all but certain types of lawsuits, it also specifically instructed plaintiffs when and how they may go about filing lawsuits.

From state to state, dram shop laws will differ, but in Texas, it’s codified. Much of the Dram Shop Act just took what had already been the practice in the common law and set it in stone, striking a balance between the rights of bars and plaintiffs and limiting the ability of plaintiffs to seek compensation to only those cases when the drinking establishment has broken specific rules.

Who Can Sue a Bar under a Dram Shop Cause of Action?

Anyone who is physically injured by virtue of a bar violating safe alcohol service rules as laid out by the TABC has the right to pursue compensation from the drinking establishment. However, the path to securing remedies for the harm done won’t be the same for all injured parties. Different classifications of plaintiffs will need to take different approaches to reach the same end of obtaining compensation, and they will face different challenges along the way.

What are the Different Types of Plaintiffs who Can File Suit in a Dram Shop Case?

Injured parties in a typical dram shop case fall into one of two categories: third-party plaintiffs, or first-party plaintiffs. A third-party plaintiff is someone other than the drunken driver who was injured in a drunk driving accident – a passenger in the intoxicated motorist’s car, the driver of another vehicle, the passenger(s) of another vehicle, pedestrians, motorcyclists, or bicyclists. The dram shop act is not limited to motor vehicle accidents involving intoxicated motorists, but any type of alcohol-induced harm that an intoxicated patron caused. For example, you could pursue a dram shop lawsuit after being attacked and beaten by an intoxicated person who had been over-served in a bar.

On the other hand, a first-party dram shop claim involves the drunken driver, either when the drunken driver sues the bar who over-served him following an injury sustained in a drunk driving accident, or the driver’s family files a wrongful death lawsuit after their loved one drinks past the point of intoxication at a bar and then dies in a drunk driving accident. Since Texas law considers negligent drinking establishments to be a cause of drunken driving accidents, then they can be held partially accountable even for harm done to the drunken driver.

What Makes a Bar Liable?

Although our dram shop laws allow you to sue a bar for contributing to the cause of a drunk driving wreck, you can only succeed with such a suit if the bar has violated very specific rules. So long as alcohol is legal to sell and consume, there must be some balance between a bar’s right to free enterprise and the public’s need to be protected from the dangers of drunken drivers. According to Texas dram shop laws, a bar is not actually liable for serving alcohol until a person becomes noticeably intoxicated, and there is no immediate assumption that a bar is liable just because an intoxicated patron left a bar and caused an accident. Rather, Texas considers the act of selling alcohol negligent only when a bar serves additional alcohol to a person who is already dangerously intoxicated.

What Constitutes a Dangerous Level of Intoxication?

Technically speaking, according to TABC guidelines in order to have a viable dram shop lawsuit, you must be able to show that the recipient of the alcohol was displaying obvious signs of intoxication such that he presented a clear and present danger to himself and others and the bar continued serving him. Now, these obvious signs of intoxication can include changes in the patrons’ physical characteristics, such as bloodshot eyes, an inability to balance while standing or walking, or a loss of control of bodily functions, or they can also include altered behavior. Some people are prone to violence when drunk, while others become more sexually uninhibited. While some people get loud and extremely extroverted when intoxicated, others become uncommonly quiet and withdrawn. Since some drinkers are more able to conceal the outward signs of intoxication than others, the sheer number of drinks ordered by a single patron can also be an indicator of intoxication.

How Can a Bar Recognize Obvious Intoxication?

First, a drinking establishment needs to make sure all of its employees have attended and completed TABC training. Not only is this required to avoid liability for harm caused by drunken patrons, but this training teaches servers how to detect obvious signs of intoxication in their customers. The most important thing is diligence – bartenders and wait-staff must keep a constant watchful eye on their patrons. If you’ve ever spent any time in bars and clubs, then you know that it’s usually not that hard to spot the intoxicated patrons. Usually, you only need to look for them. Although, as we mentioned, some drinkers can hide the signs of intoxication, so servers need a way of detecting when these customers are intoxicated. Just as with observing patrons, this isn’t that difficult either. To order food and drinks, most bars and restaurants now use some sort of computerized system. Thus, every time a patron orders a drink on his tab, a bartender just needs to be observant of how many drinks have been ordered by this person. Once the amount of beverages purchased has surpassed the amount it would take to make the customer intoxicated, then service should be cut off in compliance with TABC mandates on safe service of alcohol.

The fact of the matter is that until drunken driving accidents happen most drinking establishments are more concerned with making profits than protecting themselves against liability. Therefore, if you’ve been injured in a drunk driving accident, the chances are strong that the drinking establishment that served the driver wasn’t taking the necessary precautions to avoid liability.

What is a Plaintiff Required to Prove?

To win a dram shop case, it’s not enough just to know that the bar served an obviously intoxicated patron, but you’re going to have to be able to prove it, along with establishing that this act was a proximate cause of the accident and your injuries.

Eye-witness accounts from bar patrons and surveillance video from the bars can demonstrate that the drunken driver was obviously intoxicated before leaving the bar. Sometimes, our attorneys have even been able to use the driver’s phone records and social network page to track down drinking buddies who can help demonstrate the recipient’s level of noticeable intoxication while he was still drinking in the bar. Moreover, other bar patrons can testify as to whether not the bar habitually serves patrons past the point of intoxication. We’ve even sent private investigators armed with surveillance cameras into bars we are investigating to attempt ordering alcohol when they’ve already had enough to become intoxicated. Interviews with employees can reveal whether or not they’ve been properly trained according to TABC regulations. Sales records and/or debit and credit card receipts can show just how many alcoholic beverages the patron bought before leaving the bar. By questioning the arresting or investigating officer, your attorney can also demonstrate the driver’s intoxication and the role it played in the accident.

What Amount Can You Sue the Bar For?

If you can prove the bar violated the TABC rules for the safe service of alcohol, and this violation caused your injuries, then you can sue the bar for damages. In a personal injury lawsuit, these damages may include compensation for:
Medical bills
Any property that may have been damaged in the wreck
Pain and suffering felt during the accident
Mental anguish experienced during rehabilitation
Lost wages during recovery time
Detrimental effects of lifelong disabilities that result from your injuries

If, conversely, your loved one is killed in a drunk driving accident, then you may be able to pursue both wrongful death damages and survival damages. Wrongful death damages can be sought by the surviving spouse, children, and parents and are intended to compensate these people for the harm done to them by virtue of the death of their loved one. These wrongful death damages may include compensation for:
Loss of monetary support
Loss of parental services for children losing parents
Loss of child’s services for a parent losing a child
Loss of spousal services
Psychological counseling for the surviving family members
Exemplary damages
Loss of companionship and society.

On the contrary, survival damages are intended to provide compensation for the losses of the decedent as a result of the accident and may only be pursued by the personal representative of the estate in the name of the closest living relative. Survival damages may include:
Funeral expenses
Compensation for the mental agony experienced due to the realization of imminent death
Medical bills charged prior to death
Compensation for the physical pain of the accident
Exemplary damages

Of note, when we begin an investigation, we send a spoliation of evidence letter to the defendant informing the bar that it’s being sued and instructing it not to destroy or tamper with evidence in any way. When a drinking establishment ignores a spoliation of evidence letter and tampers with any evidence covered by the letter, then the court will likely enforce Death Penalty Sanctions as punishment, increasing the amount of damages.

Also, damages in a drunk driving accident are split between the drunken driver and the negligent drinking establishment, provided the liability of both can be proven in court. The attorneys on all sides will present arguments as to the respective degree of liability for each party, and the damages owed by the liable parties will reflect this percentage of liability as decided by the court.

You Need Help with a Dram Shop Case

If you’ve been injured by a drunken driver whom you suspect may have been over-served by a bar or restaurant, then you will likely need the assistance of an experienced dram shop lawyer to successfully sue for the damages you deserve. You stand very little chance of finding the evidence you need to prove the drinking establishment’s negligence without the assistance of a professional investigator who has handled investigations like this on numerous occasions and knows what to look for. However, you also need an attorney who understands the wide scope of financial harm that can result from serious injuries and the importance of consulting with a number of different medical experts to accurately estimate the harm caused by your accident.

Finally, you need an experienced lawyer who knows what to expect from dram shop defense attorneys and how to overcome the challenges they will present, as well as, the importance of proving up the value of damages to allow you to hold all liable parties accountable and get maximum compensation.

Our lawyers have spent more than 22 years litigating dram shop cases, so we’ve worked hard to obtain the experience you need to help you get the damages warranted by the injuries you’ve sustained or the loved one you’ve lost. If you’d like to learn more about how we can help with your dram shop case, then call us today for a free consultation.

===================gtg

Personal Injury Lawyers » First Party and Third Party Dram Shop Cases

What are the Differences Between a 1st-Party Dram Shop Claim and a 3rd-Party Dram Shop Claim?

Texas drunk driver accident attorney

Whether you or your loved one has been injured by a drunk driver or you or your loved one was intoxicated and was injured as the result of being over-served by an establishment licensed to sell alcohol, it is possible to recover from these injuries under the Texas Dram Shop Act. However, it is essential that you understand the differences between a First Party Dram Shop Claim and a Third Party Dram Shop Claim.

Understanding the distinction between the two is necessary because though the two cases have similarities, they also have unique differences that require a different approach. If you are facing either situation, handling a Dram Shop case on your own is not advisable. Our attorneys can help you with your case and we know how to navigate through the different phases of litigating a Dram Shop Claim.

First-Party Claim vs. Third-Party Claim… What’s the Difference?

When you or a loved one has been injured, understanding your status as a plaintiff is critical. In a Dram Shop Claim depending on your status in the claim you could be considered a First Party or a Third Party. In a First Party Dram Shop Claim, the injured person is typically the intoxicated person that has been over-served by the bar or other establishment licensed to sell alcohol. In these cases, the intoxicated person is the only person that has been injured or killed as the result of being served alcohol while obviously intoxicated. In a Third Party Dram Shop Claim, the injured person is typically an innocent third party that has been injured by the intoxicated person that has been over-served by the bar or other establishment licensed to sell alcohol. Third-party claims are usually related to injuries from drunk driving accidents, but injuries to an innocent third party can also happen when the intoxicated person assaults them in some manner. Regardless of your status as a First Party or Third Party plaintiff, our attorneys can help you take legal action on your Dram Shop Claim. Dram Shop cases are not easy and having a lawyer on your side who knows how to litigate these claims will make the difference in your ability to be successful in your claim.

Commonalities in First Party and Third Party Dram Shop Claims

If your claim is a First Party claim or a Third Party claim, there are certain common issues present in both cases. The elements that will need to be proven are essentially the same. In both instances, the plaintiff has the burden of proving that the licensed establishment provided alcohol to an adult person that was obviously intoxicated and in both cases, a thorough investigation must take place.

Proving Obvious Intoxication

A dram shop case hinges on the plaintiff’s ability to prove that the bar or other establishment licensed to serve alcohol provided alcohol to an obviously intoxicated person. In a dram shop case, the intoxication must be obvious or should have been obvious to the employees or bartenders of the licensed establishment. If you as a first-party or third-party plaintiff are unable to prove that the establishment licensed to supply alcohol knew or should have known the defendant was obviously intoxicated, you will not be successful in your Dram Shop Act claim.

Proving obvious intoxication is done primarily through one of two ways. First, the fact the defendant was obviously intoxicated can be established through eyewitness testimony of the bar employees and patrons of the bar. For example, some signs of obvious intoxication include trouble standing, smelling of alcohol, slurred speech, or being unable to communicate effectively. If the defendant was supplied alcohol by the bar or licensed establishment while exhibiting these behaviors, the bar could be liable under the Dram Shop Act for serving alcohol to an obviously intoxicated person.

Second, obvious intoxication can be established through considering the knowledge and training of the employees or bartenders of the licensed establishment providing the alcohol. The Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission (TABC) requires that establishments licensed to serve alcohol provide training to its employees related to the effects of alcohol, spotting under-aged drinkers, and other alcohol and safety-related topics. This training includes understanding how many and what kind of alcoholic drinks are served to a person results in intoxication. For example, if a defendant was served 5 shots of tequila in an hour, the TABC training indicates that a person that has consumed that much alcohol in such a short period of time is legally intoxicated. Therefore if an establishment has served the defendant in such a manner they could be liable under the Dram Shop Act because by the TABC regulations the person is now legally intoxicated and the obviously intoxicated standard has been met.

Conducting a Thorough Investigation
In a First Party or Third Party Dram Shop claim a thorough investigation must be completed if your claim is to be successful. The investigation will include securing police reports, any video surveillance or security tapes from the bar, eye witness and employee testimony, locating any receipts that indicate how many drinks were served to the intoxicated person, and other documents. The investigation is important because it will help demonstrate to the jury the role the licensed establishment played in serving an obviously intoxicated person and ultimately you or your loved one’s injuries.

Conducting the investigation is not as easy as it might seem. Even though there are documents to obtain from the accident or altercation if these are needed for a third party claim they can be especially difficult to obtain. This is because in the third-party claims the third-party does not have automatic access to the documents needed for their case. For example, witness testimony may be difficult to come by because many of the witnesses may be employees of the establishment that will be made a party to the lawsuit at some point, so even talking to these witnesses will be an uphill battle. Another reason conducting the investigation may be difficult is because the drunk driver that caused the accident may be under criminal investigation as well so getting a statement from them or an account of the accident and where they were served the drinks after they were already intoxicated is going to be difficult to obtain because they will not be willing to voluntarily incriminate themselves.

The investigation needs to take place as soon as possible because the more time passes the greater the risk that evidence could be lost, witnesses’ memories could fade and crucial documents become unavailable. The difficulty of securing the information needed for a successful investigation is a major reason why handling your Dram Shop claim on your own is not a good idea. Our attorneys are knowledgeable and know how to conduct investigations like these. Contacting us early on in your case will increase the odds that information helpful to your case will be discovered. We know how to conduct investigations and gather the evidence necessary for you to prevail against the licensed establishment that supplied alcohol to an obviously intoxicated person.

Unique Aspects of Third Party Claims

As discussed above, though first-party and third-party claims have similarities and common issues that must be addressed, each type of case also has unique aspects and challenges to overcome. These challenges require an approach tailored to the situation. What will be sufficient in one case will not be in another, so handling this without the benefit of an attorney like the ones at Our Law Office can complicate and damage your case.

In a third-party claim, the injured person is typically someone that has no existing connection to either the intoxicated person that injured them or the licensed establishment that served the intoxicated person the alcohol. For example, an innocent motorist is involved and injured in an accident by a drunk driver. In a case such as this, the motorist hit by the drunk driver may have a case against the drunk driver as well as the licensed establishment that continued to serve them alcohol when they were obviously intoxicated. Another scenario that could result in a third-party claim would be when the passenger of the intoxicated person is injured by the drunk driver. Although this does not happen as often as another motorist being injured by the intoxicated driver, it does happen and our attorneys can assist with this as well.

There are also cases where a third party has been injured without any involvement in an auto accident. Cases such as a physical altercation between the injured third party and the intoxicated person can also give rise to a Dram Shop claim. Though less a less likely occurrence than an auto accident, in this example, the innocent third party was still injured as the result of the actions of the intoxicated person and the licensed establishment that served them. Intoxicated people are often belligerent, argumentative, and confrontational and are often more likely to cause an unprovoked altercation with someone than they would sober. When this happens the innocent third party that was attacked and drawn into a physical altercation with the intoxicated person may have a case against both the intoxicated person and the licensed establishment that served alcohol to the intoxicated person.

Apportioning Fault in Third-Party Claims

In many cases, before making an award the jury will determine the proportion of fault that each party in the case is responsible for. When fault is apportioned the damages are looked at from a total of 100% and the jury will determine which percentage each party is responsible for. The percentage of fault that belongs to each party directly relates to the amount of the damages they will be responsible for. For example, if an innocent third party was injured in a drunk driving accident and has $100,000 in damages, the jury may find that the drunk driver was at 60% at fault for the accident and the licensed establishment that served the alcohol to the drunk driver was 40% at fault for the accident based on their actions in continuing to serve an obviously intoxicated person. In simple terms, the driver would be responsible for $60,000 of the innocent third party’s damages, and the bar would be responsible for $40,000 of the damages.

In third-party Dram Shop claims the injured third party is often seen as an innocent party because they were injured due to no fault of their own. They were not intoxicated and may have no direct connection to the drunk driver or the licensed bar that served them the alcohol. This is different than in a first-party claim because obviously, the injured person played no direct part in their injury. Even if the injured third party does have some fault in their injury, this will probably not be as detrimental to the case as in a first-party claim. For example, the third-party was injured in a physical altercation with the intoxicated first party, but the third party contributed to the start of the fight. They will bear some liability for their injuries, but the jury probably will see their actions as less offensive than the actions of the obviously intoxicated party and the licensed establishment that supplied them the alcohol.

Unique Aspects of First Party Claims

First-party Dram Shop claims are unique because it is typically the intoxicated person or their family that is bringing the claim against the licensed establishment that served them alcohol. This often happens when the intoxicated person has been injured or killed due to their intoxication from either hurting themselves in an accident or succumbing to alcohol poisoning or dying an alcohol-related death. First-party claims must be handled carefully because the jury will see the first party as directly contributing to the intoxication that injured them. This is important because when it comes to apportioning fault if the first party is found to be more at fault for their injuries than the licensed establishment that continued to serve them alcohol though they were visibly intoxicated. For example, if the family brings a wrongful death claim of $1,000,000.00 for their loved one after they died as the result of their intoxication after being served alcohol by a licensed establishment if the jury finds that their loved one was 60% at fault for their own death the family will not recover anything. This is because the first party was found to be more at fault for their injuries than the licensed establishment that served them the alcohol. This is why it is so important to have lawyers like ours on your side.

To be successful in a first-party Dram Shop claim it is crucial that the first party demonstrates to the jury that the licensed establishment bears more responsibility for the injuries or death that has occurred. The jury must see that though the first party does bear some responsibility, the establishment licensed by the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission bears more responsibility because they were in a position to demonstrate better judgment than the intoxicated first party by not continuing to serve them alcohol. The privilege of being licensed by the State of Texas to serve alcoholic beverages to the public comes with a responsibility to the public as well, and that includes not serving alcohol to obviously intoxicated people. If the licensed establishments did not have this responsibility the Dram Shop Act would not exist. Having a lawyer on your side that can effectively make this argument and demonstrate to the jury how the licensed establishment was derelict in its duties is important to a successful case. This is why our Law Office is the smart choice for litigating your first-party Dram Shop claim. We have the experience and skills needed to be successful in Dram Shop claims.

Dunk driver accident lawsuit attorney – Either Way, It’s a Challenge

Whether you are the first party or the third party in a Dram Shop claim, your case will be met with challenges. From understanding the different aspects of your case to conducting a thorough investigation, each phase has its tests and hurdles that must be cleared before your case can move forward to a successful conclusion.

Going at this alone will not only be difficult but can jeopardize the success of your case. Our lawyers have the skills and experiences necessary to face the challenges Dram Shop cases present and we can work through them for you. Contact us today.

===================gtg

Statute of Limitations in a Drunk Driving Accident –  Personal Injury Lawyers

What is the Statute of Limitations for a Texas Dram Shop Accident Injury or Death?

The statute of limitations for dram shop cases in the state of Texas is two years. This is codified in the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. This is because all civil cases based upon personal injury, trespass for injury to the estate or to the property of another, and conversion of personal property are grouped under the umbrella of a two-year statute. The public policy reason why the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code established this time frame is that individuals who suffer an injury are expected to bring their lawsuits timely.

Basis of the Personal Injury Lawsuit

The interesting thing about dram shop cases unlike typical negligence cases is that there is a statute that enforces the law criminally and the statute allows for civil causes of action. The actual dram shop statute is found in the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Code § 2.02 and it states that the statute does not affect the right of a person to bring a civil lawsuit based on personal injury. The statute does not state what the statute of limitations is to bring your suit. The reason for this is that the statute can be used in criminal or civil cases. You will need to go to the corresponding resource material to find the statute of limitations. This means, if you are suing civilly, you would look to the Civil Practice and Remedies Code; and if you are filing a criminal charge you would go to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.

Chapter 16 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code sets out the statutes of limitations in Texas for civil claims. Specifically, § 16.003 in the code is for the two-year statute of limitations and this section covers all general personal injury claims. The chapter sets out an umbrella for two-year statutes of personal injury claims. A violation of the dram shop statute that lead to a car wreck where people were hurt and property was damaged would fall under that umbrella. If the state also wanted to charge the individual or establishment that violated the dram shop act, then they would follow the statute of limitations found in the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. A violation of the dram shop act would most likely be a misdemeanor and would fall under the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure § 12.02. Like, the comparable civil statute the criminal statute would also run in two years.

Two Years to File

The reason for the statute of limitations is to encourage people to act in a reasonable time period on their claims. The person claiming injury has the responsibility not to let their claim languish and to file timely. Public policy dictates that we do not want people to have the cloud of potential litigation hanging over their heads for an unreasonable amount of time and instead have the claimant resolve the matter efficiently. Experience tells us that witness memories fade over time; the evidence is lost, corrupted, or destroyed; and crime scenes can change. The better course of action is to act on their claims quickly. In the case, of a dram shop statute violation, this is even more so because we want the state to act quickly if they are going to criminally indict someone and we don’t want persons to be constantly worried whether or not criminal charges are going to be issued against them.

If you have a dram shop case you should contact our Law Office today. The longer you wait the more likely it is that your case could be preempted by the statute of limitations. In order for us to help you, the investigation into the facts and evidence of your case should be done as soon as possible while the evidence is still fresh. Contact our attorneys and get your case moving today.

=========================gtg

Drunk Driver Lawsuits, Litigation & Going to Trial – Personal Injury Lawyers

The Process of Filing a Dram Shop Lawsuit in Texas, Litigating it, Going to Trial, and Presenting Your Case to a Jury

Once you have met with one of our attorneys the next step will be for one of our attorneys to file your lawsuit for you and to serve the defendant with notice of the lawsuit. A proper venue based on the facts of the case will be determined by the attorney and the attorney will file the case with the court located in that jurisdiction. The defendant will have twenty-three to twenty-five days to respond. If the defendant fails to respond to the lawsuit, the court will find that the defendant has defaulted and will automatically rule in favor of the plaintiff.

If the defendant does respond, the time period for discovery will complete twenty days after their response. The discovery process is the time period allowed for both sides to complete their factual investigations and to exchange their findings regarding the case. Due to the nature of dram shop cases, there is a lot more information that needs to be collected than in a standard personal injury case. Because of this, it is important to get your case started as quickly as possible so as much information as possible can be collected and reviewed.

Types of Discovery Evidence

Both sides require specific information that is not only unique to a dram shop case but unique to whether the injured party has survived their injuries or whether they have died and their family is bringing a wrongful death suit on their behalf. The defendant will want to have access to information such as:

The identities of the deceased’s children
Copies of their birth certificates
Marriage licenses
Funeral expenses
Tax returns
Past medical history
Medical records
Autopsy photos or photos that prove injury
Plaintiff’s witness statements
Reports from the plaintiff’s expert witnesses
Any police reports, photos, or video of the accident

And the plaintiff’s attorney will also be conducting an investigation and collecting evidence from the defendant in the discovery process. The type of information required will determine whether the case is an injury or wrongful death case; and whether the plaintiff’s attorney is bringing suit against only the drinking establishment that served an intoxicated person or whether the attorney is suing both the drunk driver and the drinking establishment. Some examples of required evidence would be:
The drunk driver’s credit card receipts
Surveillance video from the bar
Training manuals that are supplied to employees
Training videos that are shown to employees
List of all employees who worked at the time of the incident
Mugs or glasses that the bar utilized to be used as trial exhibits
Reports from Defendant’s expert witnesses
Defendant’s witness list and their statements
Reports of previous lawsuits against the bar
Reports of prior incidents at the bar
Depositions are one of the most important parts of the discovery process in a dram shop case and there are a lot more depositions that have to be taken than in a standard personal injury case. The reason for this the plaintiff will have to show what the servers knew or should have known at the time they served the inebriated patron. In order to show what the servers knew or should have known they will testify under oath in a deposition. The wait staff, bartenders, bar backers, and other employees will all be deposed.

The testimony provided by the employees can be used to prove up the dram shop case but can also be used to defeat affirmative defenses such as the safe harbor provision. Safe harbor is an affirmative defense which means that the defendant has to prove the elements of the defense by putting on evidence. In particular, the defendant will have to show that he attended required certification classes offered by the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission (TABC), his employees also attended the training, and after the training was completed the defendant did not actively encourage his employees to break TABC rules. If the defendant does so successfully, the burden then shifts to the plaintiff who is then required by the court to provide at least a scintilla of evidence that defeats the defendant’s claim. A scintilla is a term of art that means any evidence at all.

Ending Discovery, Mediation, & Trial

If after discovery has been completed, the defendant has attempted a motion for summary judgment and it has failed the defendant may then offer to submit to mediation. Mediation is a form of dispute resolution where the parties agree to allow a mediator or a referee to help negotiate a resolution that both sides deem to be fair. Mediation can be helpful because it can lower the cost of litigation and allow both parties to resolve their differences. However, mediation is not required and neither party is bound to submit to the mediator or to the final terms of the mediation. Mediation is more akin to a contract where both parties agree to be bound by the terms, unlike a final adjudication by a court of law where a party is ordered to submit. As such, a mediator has no legal authority.

And if the mediation does fail, the next step is to set the case for trial. Once the case is set for trial, the attorneys on both sides will have to prepare their witnesses and evidence to present before a jury. Both sides will have several types of expert witnesses that will be presented to the court. Toxicologists will be needed to testify as to the blood alcohol level of the drunken patron that was served more alcohol by the bar. A safe alcohol sales consultant may testify to her review of the bar policies of serving liquor. Damages experts will testify to the extent of the injuries to the plaintiff or, if it is a wrongful death suit, a medical examiner will testify as to what the cause of the deceased death was.

In the case of a wrongful death suit, you may also need to address the issue of the survival claim. A survival claim is ancillary to a wrongful death claim and addresses the pain and suffering that the deceased person had to endure in the time period after they were injured and prior to their death. It can also be applied to lost income the deceased person would have earned for their family and for loss of consortium. This can be proved with testimony from emergency medical teams, financial analysts, doctors, and emergency room personnel. A medical examiner may also be used to show the exact time of death and the relative pain and suffering the deceased would have experienced in that time frame.

If the plaintiff survived the injury, medical doctors, pain analysts, and psychologists can testify to the injury the plaintiffs suffered, how long the injury will last, continuing rehabilitation that may be needed, whether the plaintiff will be able to work again, whether he will be able to provide for his family financially, and the mental state of the plaintiff. All of this testimony will be used at trial in order to give the court and the jury a complete picture of the severity of the plaintiff’s injury and how it may have permanently affected their life and the lives of their family. After the plaintiff’s attorney has completed their case, the defense will have an opportunity to rebut, and the court will adjudicate the claim.

It is important in your case that you hire an attorney that has a strong understanding of how bars are supposed to operate, how alcohol affects the human body, and be able to translate all of that information into an easy-to-understand argument the jury can comprehend. Juries tend to be biased against only the drunk driver and not against the drinking establishment. They will tend to believe that all of the blame should rest only on the drunk driver. This is why it is important to have an attorney who can help the jury understand what is required under the law, why the law is in place, and why drinking establishments should be held accountable when they violate the law.

Our attorneys have litigated dram shop cases. We have the experience to navigate the tough dram shop case. Our attorneys will guide you through your case from inception, investigation, discovery, mediation, trial, and adjudication. If you have been injured by a drunk driver or if someone you care about has been killed by a drunk driver, you can still help them by fighting for them against all responsible parties. Call Our Law Office and speak to one of our attorneys today.

======================gtg

Spoliation of Evidence in a Dram Shop Case – Personal Injury Lawyers

Preventing the Defendants From Erasing or Destroying Evidence Following a Drunk Driver Accident

Spoliation is a huge problem in dram shop cases. In this instance, spoliation is the intentional withholding, hiding, altering, or destroying of any evidence that would be relevant in a dram shop case. Part of the reason why is the limited availability of evidence the liquidity of working staff in establishments that are more likely to violate dram shop laws. In order to properly investigate a dram shop case, the litigants must act quickly to ensure that no evidence is lost before it can be accounted for and recorded. In order to have the best case for trial as much evidence, whether it is direct evidence or circumstantial evidence must be preserved so that it can be presented to a jury. The best way to ensure that no evidence is lost is with a spoliation letter to the defendant.

The spoliation of evidence is best prevented by having your attorney issue a spoliation letter. What the letter does is put all parties on notice that litigation is a matter concerning them is about to be commenced and that all evidence relating to the matter must be preserved. For dram shop cases, this means that the bar or restaurants records need to be protected so that they are not destroyed, lost, or altered. This would also include records and testimony of employees that work at the establishment. Because of the volatility of service industries like bars and restaurants, this must be done quickly. Many establishments have high turnover rates for staff and the testimony of those persons could be lost if the employee did not leave accurate contact information. Many establishments also are owned by a single proprietor who may have an inferior system or no system at all for keeping track of employees or the records of the sales of liquor.

Sanctions for Spoliation

Prior to litigation, if a defendant has altered, concealed, or destroyed evidence the court has wide discretion to issue discovery sanctions. The Texas Rules of Civil Procedure grant this wide discretion to courts because the act of spoiling evidence interferes with their ability to determine the facts of the case based on the entirety of the evidence. A court has several options on what sanctions it will impose and will do so based on the severity of the offense. A court may hold a party in contempt, strike a portion or the entirety of a party’s pleadings, issue financial charges against the party who spoiled evidence with the other side’s discovery costs, dismiss the lawsuit in its entirety, or issue a summary judgment against the party responsible for the spoliation.

Spoliation by Inference

Another part of the reason that courts are given wide latitude to punish is based on the theory of spoliation by inference. Spoliation by inference has been established because of the unique logical reversal that must be made in order to prove a piece of evidence must have existed and that the reason the spoliator concealed it is that, even if there is no direct evidence to prove the evidence is negative to the spoliator, it can be inferred that the evidence is or would have been and that is why the evidence was spoiled. Essentially, the theory allows the judge or jury to make a negative evidentiary inference.

The resulting conclusion from the inference is referred to as “consciousness by guilt”. That is, the person knows this evidence is going to destroy their case so instead, they destroyed the evidence in order to get rid of it. Thus, in order to address the conscious guilt and to discourage other future litigants from attempting the same action the court may issue such severe penalties as completely dismissing the case or giving a winning judgment to the party who did not spoil evidence. In some jurisdictions there can also be separate civil liability. You could have a party who lost an original case because they spoiled evidence only to turn around and be sued civilly by the party to whom you just lost your original case.

In sum, spoliation of evidence is a bad idea with harsh penalties but you only get punished if you get caught which is why some people will still attempt it. In order to make sure that your interests are protected, a spoliation letter must be sent out to put all parties on notice and a full investigation by an independent third party should be done to take account of all the available evidence. Even finding something small could start a trail to a concealed piece of evidence that could easily prove your entire case. To speak with us about your case, call today.

=========================gtg

Dram Shop Evidence: TABC Blood Alcohol Chart – Personal Injury Lawyers

Information on Content in Relation to Time and Number of Drinks

In a successful drunken driving accident lawsuit in any major metropolitan area, the pursuit of damages rarely ends with obtaining compensation from only the impaired or intoxicated motorist. Oftentimes, there was a negligent provider of alcohol (a “dram shop” known colloquially in the legal community) that served the influenced individual too much. If this is the case in your accident, then you may be able to go after both parties in civil court.

To beat a dram shop in court, you need convincing evidence to back up your claim. A major piece of evidence that could achieve this purpose is the Texas Alcohol Beverage Commission’s (TABC’s) Blood Alcohol Percentage Charts for men and women. We at our Law Office hope that, as you learn more about these charts, you will see just how negligent the bar involved was, as well as understand how attorneys such as ourselves can further clarify the negligence of a defendant.

The TABC’s has two charts on blood alcohol percentage, measuring how much a given number of drinks will influence you based on weight and sex. Although not everyone has the same tolerance, the charts do make some critical generalizations:

Obviously, the more alcoholic beverages you consume, the quicker you will become intoxicated. While this is true, what the chart does not suggest is the very real possibility that the drinks consumed will not all be of the same alcohol percentage. For example, high alcohol content beverages, such as hard liquor or even wine, should get a person intoxicated much faster than a small can of beer would.

The less someone weighs, the faster he or she will become intoxicated with each new beverage. Put simply, smaller bodies are less capable of taking a substance as intense as alcohol.

Females have a lower tolerance for alcohol than men. This is clearly not always the case: some women can be very heavy drinkers, while some men can be relative “lightweights.” Be that as it may, the point of intoxication for women comes much sooner – especially for those who weigh 180 pounds or less.

In proving that the restaurant, bar, or nightclub over-served you, each generalization is helpful in establishing negligence. When an outfit is TABC-certified, established in a community, and receives constant business, they are all things that vigilant servers should watch out for. Naturally, those people whose consumption of heavier, darker liquors should be watched by employees, and denied alcohol far sooner than someone who is simply sipping on Tom Collins cocktails with very little actual gin. Likewise, consumption of the female patrons, as well as the lighter visitors, should also be observed carefully by dram shop staff. If all of these basic duties of care are abdicated, then they are said to have been “breached.” So in the examples above, one person driving off and causing an accident could be enough for a cause of action to sue.

Be that as it may, you and your liquor liability attorney must account for the defendants in front of you. After all, people deal in generalizations, stereotypes, and prejudices every day, so for the most part, drawing conclusions based on those is a simple process; however, it takes a greater degree of skill for a lawyer to deal in specifics. It would be easy enough to say, “Look at these charts: because the driver who received alcohol from the defense was a 100-pound woman, she was far more susceptible to intoxication.” However, simply being a 100-pound woman is not enough to establish negligence on the alcohol provider’s part; rather, you must establish that she was over-served, which requires contextualizing the scene of the bar that night: how well off she was after two beers, whether or not she could even move after four, and so on. Part of the reason why we have civil trials in the first place is that you cannot “calculate” a dram shop’s negligence – a stark contrast from the holistic, comprehensive approach that makes our justice system so great.

Understand Evidence with Our Law Office

While the TABC’s charts are useful tools both in and out of court, definitive conclusions cannot be drawn from only the charts. You need legal representation to tie everything together – legal representation such as ours. We’ve been handling personal injury and wrongful death cases for residents of Texas since 1990, putting our talents to work so that hundreds of victims could see the financial compensation they so rightfully deserve. In particular, we have handled a considerable number of dram shop cases, so we know the ins and outs of dealing with multiple defendants at once.

If you have further questions about dram shop claims or want to begin your pursuit of justice today, then call our Law Office. We know the law, and can give you consultation at no out-of-pocket expense, so reach us with confidence.

==============================gtg

Dram Shop Evidence: Amount of Alcohol Consumed – Personal Injury Lawyers

How the Amount of Alcohol Consumed can Affect Your Dram Shop Case

If you have been injured in an accident by a drunk driver, not only do you have rights against the drunk driver but you could also bring a lawsuit against the establishment that sold alcohol to the drunk driver if they were obviously intoxicated at the time. The lawsuit against the bar or establishment is called a Dram Shop Act claim.

To be successful in this kind of claim you must demonstrate that the drunk driver was obviously intoxicated when they were sold more alcohol by the bar or establishment and the intoxication was a cause of the accident and your injuries. To be able to demonstrate this to a jury, understanding alcohol affects the body based on the amount consumed and the person’s body type is very important to your case.

Alcohol’s General Properties

Alcohol works as a depressant and primarily affects your central nervous system. The extent to which your nervous system is impacted by alcohol depends on the proportion of alcohol concentration in your blood. When alcohol is consumed, it is absorbed quickly into the blood and distributed throughout your body. Because this happens so quickly, even a little bit of alcohol in your system can alter your body’s ability to function normally and can impact your behavior. Those changes in body function are often displayed very early on when alcohol is being consumed, so odds are the drunk driver that injured you in the accident displayed some of the signs of obvious intoxication, yet was continuously served by the bar or other establishment they visited. If this was the case in your accident the establishment that served the drunk driver needs to be held responsible as well.

Based on the amount of alcohol consumed and the amount of alcohol concentration in the blood, the body can go through 7 stages of intoxication. In the chart below, each stage of intoxication and the signs and symptoms that are often displayed during each stage are explained below. Understanding what signs were displayed and when the signs were displayed by the drunk driver that hit you can go a long way in proving your case to the jury.

Blood Alcohol Content Intoxication Stage Symptoms

0.01 – 0.05 Subclinical Stage Behavior appears normal just by casual observation.

0.03 – 0.12 Euphoria Stage (Legal intoxication in Texas [0.08 BAC] begins between this
stage and Excitement Stage below) Mild euphoric state, more
lively personality traits displayed, decreased inhibitions, decrease
in judgment and beginning of sensory and motor skills
impairment.

0.09 – 0.25 Excitement Stage Emotional instability, loss of critical judgment skills, perception,
memory and comprehension impaired, sensory-motor
coordination issues, and drowsiness.

0.18 – 0.30 Confusion Stage Disorientation, mental confusion, dizziness, slurred speech,
staggering,  and increased pain threshold.

0.25 – 0.40 Stupor Stage Approaching loss of motor functions, vomiting, inability to stand
or walk, and impaired consciousness.

0.35 – 0.50 Coma Stage Complete unconsciousness, drop in body temperature,
impairment of circulation and respiration.

0.45 + Death Death from respiratory arrest.

With the exception of the Subclinical Stage, each stage of intoxication can include signs of direct evidence of obvious intoxication that can be used against the bar or establishment that served the drunk driver that injured you. The intensity of the intoxication symptoms will depend on other factors such as body composition, but very early on when a person is drinking signs of intoxication appear.

Body Weight, Rate of Consumption, Amount of Alcohol Consumed, and Gender Differences

Many factors can go into the rate a person becomes intoxicated or displays signs of obvious intoxication. A person’s body weight, the rate of their consumption of alcohol, and the amount and type of alcohol they have consumed are all big factors in determining intoxication levels and obvious intoxication. Individuals vary and so does the rate at which they become obviously intoxicated. Our lawyers understand this and can explain these differences so a jury understands as well. We can help demonstrate that the drunker driver was obviously intoxicated and the establishment that served them alcohol despite this obvious intoxication needs to share in the liability for your injuries.

Body Weight as a Factor

Generally speaking, a person that weighs less will feel the effects of alcohol and probably display signs of obvious intoxication sooner than a person that weighs more. The concentration of alcohol in the blood and its effects are directly related to the amount of water in a person’s system as well. To understand the level of blood alcohol concentration you can simply take the amount of alcohol in a person’s system divided by the amount of water in their system. That means that in general terms if two people of similar body compositions but different weights, the person that weighs more will have a lower concentration of alcohol in the blood even if they consume the same amount. Conversely, if two people weigh the same but one has more muscle and one has more fatty tissue, the person with more fatty tissue will be more impacted by the alcohol consumption because fatty tissue does not contain much water nor can it absorb much alcohol. Therefore more alcohol will be in the bloodstream affecting the nervous system and causing impairment.

Rate of Consumption as a Factor

As we have discussed, blood alcohol concentration largely depends on the amount of alcohol consumed and how quickly the person’s body breaks down the alcohol that was consumed. The body typically breaks down alcohol at a consistent pace for elimination from the body, so consuming alcohol at a rate faster than the body can break down the alcohol results in a cumulative effect. This cumulative effect is what contributes to the stages of intoxication. More and more alcohol enters the blood faster than it can be eliminated and the body’s natural reaction to this is impairment. That is why it is important to understand that it is not just the kind of alcohol that is consumed, but the amount consumed and the time frame in which the alcohol was consumed is key. For example, a person can consume three mixed drinks in a setting, and depending upon the time frame that passes between drinks, it is possible that they will not display any signs of intoxication or even be legally intoxicated. Three drinks over the course of a two-hour meal will usually not have the same impact that the same three drinks will have over just an hour’s time and if no food is consumed during this time period.

Demonstrating how much alcohol the drunk driver had at the bar can be done through direct evidence such as time and date stamped receipts from the bar as well as the amount of alcohol or number of drinks purchased. One person consuming 10 drinks, regardless of the time period in which the drinks were consumed will more often than not result in some level of intoxication, and the receipt from the bar can be evidence of that and bolster your claim.

Gender Differences and Amount Consumed

Gender differences also play a role in the level of intoxication and the display of obvious signs of intoxication. Generally speaking, women tend to have more body fat than men, thus less water in their systems to balance out the alcohol and the amount consumed. This means that taken from a general perspective, if a woman and a man weigh the same amount and consume the same amount of alcohol and consume the alcohol at the same rate, the woman will feel and display the effects of intoxication before the man does because of her body composition. The more body fat that women generally have allows for more concentration of alcohol in the blood and the display of obvious signs of intoxication. Obviously, this does not mean this will always be the case but generally speaking this break down applies. The differences in alcohol concentration in the blood based on average body composition differences by gender is between 16% and 10% depending on the age of the people involved.

Age also plays a factor in the concentration of alcohol in the blood based on the amount consumed. As both men and women age, each gender has a decrease in the amount of water available in the body. Therefore older men and women will have a higher concentration of alcohol in the blood and will probably present signs of obvious intoxication before a younger person will.

The Amount of Alcohol Consumed As Evidence

As discussed above, the amount of alcohol the drunk driver that hit you consumed can be powerful evidence in your Dram Shop Act case against the bar or restaurant that served them. When their body composition, gender, and rate of consumption are considered together along with the amount of alcohol they were served by the business involved, that business’ liability for your injuries can be assessed by a jury. Gathering this evidence and presenting it to a jury in a manner that not only demonstrates the drunk drivers’ liability but also highlights the business’ failure to act responsibly when serving them is crucial to a successful Dram Shop Act case. Our attorneys not only have the experience and resources to help you with your case, but we have the desire to as well. Drunk drivers cause many injuries and deaths each year in Texas. We work to make sure drunk drivers are held accountable and we will help you go after the businesses that aided the drunk driver by continuously supplying alcohol to an obviously intoxicated person. Call us today. We can help you.

==============================gtg

Tier1 Law 1.3 Jones Act / Premises Liability / Product Liability / Medical Malpractice – gtg

======================================gtg
Vessels in Navigable Waters

How the Jones Act Applies in Cases of Workers Injured While Employed on Vessels in Navigable Waters

The lawyers at Our Law Office represent seriously injured men and women, such as seamen injured while working on watercraft. Due to the hazardous nature of working on the water, the law takes special care of those injured while doing so. The law allows injured seamen to seek substantial recoveries for their injuries if they suffer those injuries while employed on “vessels in navigable waters.”

What is a Vessel?

Courts have broadly interpreted the word “vessel” as used in the Jones Act and other maritime laws. As a result, a vessel can mean just about any craft capable of navigating on water.

Before modern technology, determining what was a vessel was more straightforward. Today, the lines are blurred. Below is a list of just some of the vessels that are the bases for modern claims based on injuries suffered in navigable waters.

Movable oil platforms
Riverboat casinos moored to the shore
Cruise ships
Ferries
Tug boats
Commercial fishing boats
Tour boats
and many more

What are Navigable Waters?

Courts have also broadly interpreted the phrase “navigable waters.” Navigable waters are defined as “waters that provide a channel for commerce and transportation of people and goods.” Clearly, oceans, gulfs, bays, rivers, harbors, ship channels, and intra-coastal waterways fall under this definition. A court even found a shallow stream navigable by only a canoe to be a navigable waterway. The general rule is that if you can navigate a vessel from a body of water to the ocean, or from one state to another state, even if only in theory, then that body of water is “navigable waters.”

Why Does It Matter?

Only a seaman employed on a vessel in navigable waters can recover compensation under the Jones Act. The issue of whether an injured worker is a seaman is normally the most important issue when seeking recovery under the Jones Act. Importantly, the injured seaman need not be on a vessel at the time of the injury.

Did You Know?

Our Maritime Accident attorneys have won thousands of cases. Call us today to discuss your case.

*According to the Jones Act, “a ‘seaman’ means an individual (except scientific personnel, a sailing school instructor, or a sailing school student) engaged or employed in any capacity on a vessel.” A seaman can be male or female.

The United States Supreme Court has ruled that those employees who spend at least 30% of their working hours aboard vessels in navigable waters are seamen by definition. Those who do not spend at least 30% of their time aboard vessels in navigable waters can still be found to be seamen if they are “exposed to the perils of the sea.”

Our Law Office

The law related to injuries suffered at sea is a complex area. If you were injured while working as a seaman on a vessel in navigable waters, or if your family member was killed while working as a seaman on a vessel in navigable waters, you may have rights to significant compensation under the Jones Act and other laws. The lawyers at Our Law Office will work hard on your behalf to enforce those rights. Please call us if you have any questions or concerns about bringing a legal claim based on your or your family member’s injury.

===================gtg

=================gtg

===========================gtg

Finding a Good Medical Malpractice Attorney – Personal Injury Lawyers

What You Should Look For When Considering a Medical Malpractice Attorney

Did You Know?

Our medical malpractice attorneys have been fighting for medical malpractice victims` rights for over 20 years. Call us to discuss your case.

If you have suffered an injury that occurred from a physician/patient relationship, you have a right to recover for any out-of-pocket expenditures you have incurred. Physicians are held to the highest standards of care because of their high intelligence and the fact that we place our lives in their hands. Furthermore, if you have suffered an injury resulting from something such as misdiagnosis or surgical error, the impact on your health can be absolutely disastrous. The reason these types of injuries can be so life-shattering is that typically they require further medical care.

In the event that you need extensive medical attention, you will begin to rack up costly medical bills. Therefore, it is in your best interests to file a medical malpractice suit against the party that is responsible for this malfeasance. You may be unsure of what the first step is to take in determining what law firm or attorney you should choose to represent your claim. Obviously, your main priority should be the success of your cause of action so that you can alleviate the physical and financial burden that has been unduly placed on you because of the carelessness of a physician or hospital.

Here at Our Law Office, we have a great deal of experience handling medical malpractice lawsuits just like the one that you should be filing in order to gain the maximum recovery possible for your losses. There are a number of ways that you can seek competent legal representation, however, if you have read this far you need not look any further. The attorneys at Our Law Office have received many awards and honors for their excellence and honorable reputation in the legal community statewide. Therefore, we can say without reservation that we are fully equipped and capable of handling your medical malpractice claim to help ensure that you do not suffer for the rest of your life with excessive hospital bills and insufferable physical ailments.

What is a Medical Malpractice Lawsuit?

A medical malpractice lawsuit is a claim that is based on an act of professional negligence by your physician or a health care provider. Basically, these types of claims arise when the treatment that you receive deviates from what is accepted in the medical field and subsequently causes you injury or a fatality occurs. There are statistics that report that about 195,000 people die every year from medical mistakes in the United States. You, as the plaintiff will be the patient that was wronged. However, there are actions that you may take in medical malpractice that permit you to file suit on behalf of another party. This is typically a loved one that you are filing suit on behalf of and it will be in the form of what is called a wrongful death action.

What has to be Proven in a Medical Malpractice Lawsuit?

In this type of lawsuit, you have to prove several different things. This is why you need to find a good medical malpractice attorney, such as those that Our Law Office employs. Medical malpractice lawsuits are highly complex and have difficult burdens of proof that must be met in order for your lawsuit to be successful. Initially, a physician-patient relationship must be established.

This can be accomplished by showing that there was a duty on the part of the doctor. This is not a matter of the credentials and skills of your physician. It means that there must be some kind of contract. Once a physician-patient relationship has been established then the duty will come into existence. The duty will be one of ordinary care. However, if the doctor is a specialist in some particular field of medicine then the duty of care will be that of a particular specialist. Then there will have to have been a breach of that duty that proximately caused your injury, which is your damages. There has to be a causal connection between the breach of duty and your injury.

As you can see, this is a very intricate process. Finding an attorney that can successfully litigate your medical malpractice lawsuit can be challenging. However, you can rest assured that if you contact the attorneys at Our Law Office you will have succeeded in finding trustworthy and hard-working lawyers that are more than able to represent your case with expert precision. To discuss your medical malpractice claim and the particulars of your specific cause of action contact Our Law Office.

====================gtg