Tier 1 – Product Liability / County vs Federal Court / Defective Boats / Defective Tires – gtg

Related Articles
3 Things That Can Ruin Your Case
Who is Liable?
Determining Value in a Products Liability Case
Cost to Pursue a Case
Where Should You File? – County or Federal Court
Defective Automobiles
Defective Boats
Tire Defects/ Rollovers
———————–

Personal Injury Lawyers – Products Liability Lawyers
We Have Been Winning Defective Products Liability Cases For Over 20 Years

Since the founding of Our Law Office in 1990, our injury attorneys have been helping those injured due to another’s negligence. This article is intended to explain products liability law, highlight some of our successes, and demonstrate how the attorneys at Our Law Office should be your first choice to represent you in your product liability claim.

How Do Product Liability Cases Work?
Product liability laws are generally all-encompassing in order to provide potential plaintiffs with all avenues of recovery to ensure that they receive the compensation that they deserve as a result of their injury. When an individual brings a product liability suit, all parties that are part of the chain of distribution will be considered potentially liable. Parties that are considered a part of the chain of distribution are all parties that had some level of involvement with the product from the design, to the sale of the product. This would include any manufacturers, sellers, delivery agencies, and all other similar parties. The thought process behind holding all these parties liable is that it is the responsibility of all parties to ensure that a safe product is being sold.
When you are pursuing a product liability cause of action there are generally two different avenues you will pursue, either a wrongful death claim or an injury claim that arose out of the defective product. Each of these types of injuries will have different recovery options. When you are dealing with a wrongful death cause of action you will typically be seeking reparation for the lost assets the deceased individual would have provided absent the death. These types of assets include loss of income. You will also seek monetary relief for your emotional losses as well as any medical expenses that your loved one may have incurred arising from the defective product injury prior to their death. An injury claim will seek relief for lost wages you may have had to incur from any absence from work. Other payments will be for pain and suffering and medical bills as well among other recoverable damages.

Example Cases
Our Law Office has handled a multitude of very diverse cases in the product liability context. We have a history of success in these types of cases, whether they are defective medicine, tires, vehicles, toys, or even boats. A few highlights of our past successes: our ability to win a case where a woman suffered injuries to her back and broke several bones as a result of a defective throttle assembly in a boat. Another case where we were successful was where our client was injured while walking through a public park when a nearby bird-feeder burst into flames. We have also won cases for auto defects and many other different product liability causes of action. There isn’t a product liability case that we are not prepared to handle.

Why Experience is Necessary
Experience matters in several different trains of thought. You want an attorney that has been successful in these types of cases because they will know what to do, and how to present your evidence in the best possible light for you. Most cases will never see the inside of a courtroom, the settlement offers that you will receive will not only be based upon the quality of your case but mostly on the defendant’s belief in their likelihood of winning the case at trial. Defense lawyers know that any case we represent will not be an easy victory in a trial, and they are more likely to avoid trial by increasing their offers.

If you or a loved one has been injured as a result of a defective or faulty product, know that you have rights. The attorneys at Our Law Office are here to help you get the results that you are seeking. We have handled a multitude of different cases just like yours and may be able to help you recover as well. To discuss your recovery options with us call us; you will be glad you did.

=====================gtg

Personal Injury Lawyers – 3 Things That Can Ruin Your Product Liability Case – Defective product lawyer
Steps to Take and Things to Avoid in Order to Preserve the Value of Your Products Liability Case

All personal injury matters are a process, not an event. You cannot simply make accusations that a product was defective and be compensated for your damages. With the assistance of a qualified attorney, you must effectively prove that the product was defective, the manufacturer is liable, and that this defect was the proximate cause of your injuries. There are many things that you must do to have a successful product liability claim, but here are a few things that can ruin your case: disposing of the product, waiting too long to pursue the claim, and hiring the wrong law firm.

Disposing of Product
When a manufacturer produces a product or a drug, they typically make thousands or even millions of these products. In some product liability cases, all examples of a particular product are defective. In this situation, everyone who owns this defective product could potentially be hurt and each person who is injured by the product will suffer the same effects. If you own or possess that particular faulty product then it is presumed that you will suffer the same effects as anyone else. However, a lot of other products fail on an individual basis; therefore you need to possess this particular product to prove that it was defective.
In cases where we need a distinct product that was defective, the product itself cannot be disposed of before the case ever goes to trial. Our attorneys are skilled and practiced in protecting evidence which is the foundation of your claim. For instance, we have litigated defective auto cases which require the vehicle to be put in storage through the duration of the case. This allows us to properly preserve the evidence, prove that it has not been tampered with, and allows us to use the evidence at our disposal. If you mistakenly dispose of the defective product or allow it to become altered in any way, the basis for your entire claim could be destroyed.

Waiting Too Long to Pursue the Claim
If you wait too long to pursue the claim, you run the risk of not having all the evidence necessary to prove your case. Many prospective clients have waited too long to hire anyone and by the time they called us, all the evidence had already been completely eradicated. As mentioned above, many product liability claims revolve around one specific piece of evidence. By waiting to file a claim against the manufacturer, the evidence can easily be destroyed or lost.
Additionally, victims can wait too long to file a product liability claim and the statute of limitations can expire. You are allowed a very narrow amount of time to file your personal injury or wrongful death claim. Once this time passes, you are completely barred from filing suit. Many people wait too long to file their product liability lawsuit and ultimately receive nothing because the statute of limitations has passed. But here’s the tricky part. Not everyone can intuitively identify when their statute of limitations begins, so they may very well think that their two years have not run out, but they are basing this on the wrong starting date.

Hiring the Wrong Law Firm
Product liability cases generally involve severe life-threatening injuries and the defendant typically will have many assets. Therefore, a lot of attorneys will see these cases as a payday, but most law firms are ill-equipped to take the necessary steps to get to that point. In other words, some firms want the case but they don’t have the means to actually work the case properly. There are numerous reasons why a law firm may be ill-equipped to handle your claim:

They do not understand how or where to file a product liability lawsuit.
They do not have the necessary connections to prove your injury.
They do not have the necessary resources to execute your claim.

Many law firms are not qualified to handle your product liability claim because they do not know how to handle such a complex lawsuit. Product liability claims involve being proficient with intricate details of the defective product and the resulting accident. Furthermore, not every law firm has attorneys which are licensed to practice in both state and federal courts. Many product liability claims must be filed in federal court and many attorneys are simply not licensed for federal court. Our Law Office has attorneys who are licensed to practice in both state and federal court and we are very familiar with handling such complex claims.
Our Law Office has plenty of connections that are necessary for the success of your claim. Proving a product liability injury often requires numerous expert witnesses and scientists who are capable of recreating the accident. Without these invaluable connections, your claim could be greatly harmed and you may not reach a successful outcome. Our attorneys have used many expert witnesses in past claims to prove injuries and convince the jury of our client’s need for compensation.
And finally, many law firms do not have the capital necessary to pursue your claim. Product liability cases are incredibly expensive and often the attorney will have to pay out of pocket to secure evidence and have experts pursue analysis. Additionally, our attorneys will probably have to travel, and, simply put, many law firms do not have this disposable income to adequately pursue your claim.

Our Law Office is dedicated to helping our clients seek the justice they deserve. We are passionate about helping victims like you and we put your needs before ours. To learn more about important aspects of your product liability lawsuit, contact Our Law Office.

=======================gtg

Responsibility for Injury Due to a Product Defect
Personal Injury Lawyers – Responsibility for Injury Due to a Product Defect
Our defective product attorneys have won thousands of cases. Call us today to discuss your case.

Who All is Responsible for an Injury Caused by a Defective Product?

We trust that the products that we purchase for ourselves and our loved ones are intended to be safe. We believe that if we use a product to clean our house, to entertain our children, or to use for our health will not cause us any harm. Products that we purchase are part of our way of life. Many of the products that are exposed to the public are supposed to be created under the federal guidelines but sometimes they are not. The reason why some of the products are not made according to federal guidelines is that the manufacturers are wanting to rush the product to the markets without properly testing it. When this happens the product becomes defective causing several people to become injured by the product. Meanwhile, the manufacturers are still making a profit.

Who is liable?
In theory, everyone who is involved in the chain of distribution can be held liable for the injuries that you suffered and a lawsuit can be brought against them. This can include the people who manufactured, created, designed, sold, and marketed the product.
Sometimes everyone in the chain of distribution can be difficult to identify because there are so many entities involved in the manufacturing and distribution of the defective product. The most common defendants identified are the manufacturer and the retailer. The manufacturer is the company that designed, marketed, and tested the product. The retailer is the company or companies that sold it.

Who can sue?
If someone bought the defective product and suffered injuries then they can bring a products liability lawsuit. However, that’s not the only person that can bring a products liability lawsuit. If you did not buy the product but you suffered injuries because you used the product or someone else used the product and you suffered injuries then you can also bring a products liability claim.

Elements of Products Liability
If you are intending to file a products liability claim for your injuries, then you must first prove that the product was defective, you suffered an injury, the injury was caused by the defective product, and you used the product the way it was intended for it to be used.

Theories of Product Liability
Once you have shown the above elements in a products liability case, then there are several theories that can be raised. You must show that the product was manufactured poorly, the product was defectively designed or the product did not include warnings or instructions about how to properly use the product.
A product that was manufactured poorly is the most common reason because all you need to show is that there was something wrong with the product when it was manufactured. For example, you purchased an expensive coffee pot from a store. You take the coffee pot home and begin to use it. You fill the coffee container with water and then you add the coffee grounds. While the coffee is brewing, the coffee pot gets too hot and explodes causing the glass to cut your arm while the hot water hits your face, causing first-degree burns. Because of the faulty coffee pot and your injuries you can bring a products liability lawsuit against the manufacturer and the retailer who sold it to you.
A defectively designed product involves multiple products of the same type that are flawed or defective. An example of this would be several coffee pots that were made by the same manufacturer and they all exploded causing first-degree burns. Products that do not include warnings or instructions are just as dangerous as the first two theories. Because the manufacturer has failed to warn you about the dangers then you are unaware of the possibilities that can occur.

Defective products in the market contribute to hundreds of accidents daily. Our attorneys at Our Law Office have successfully litigated products liability cases against the manufacturers and the retailers for our clients. Our attorneys have over 20 years of experience and will vigorously fight for your rights. Call us any day or night to receive a free consultation.

=======================gtg

Personal Injury Lawyers – How Much is my Product Liability Case Worth?

Determining the Value of a Products Liability, Personal Injury, or Wrongful Death Case
We have found that the question which is often asked by our clients is how much is my products liability case is worth? However, the appropriate question is How much compensation is enough for me?

In our opinion, a settlement is not in our client’s best interest unless it covers past and future losses. A settlement might not be enough for the injuries that you have incurred. A settlement might warrant only enough for you to cover your medical bills but it might not be enough to take care of your loss of income, your mental anguish that you are suffering due to the accident, or any other

Each Case is Different
Imagine that you are driving an SUV and the tire blows out. You are paralyzed from the waist down. Are a million dollars enough? Are two million dollars enough? What about three million dollars? The appropriate answer is: enough compensation is the amount that pays for the full impact that you sustained on your lifestyle. Costs such as the need for special vehicles if you were are no longer to walk, the accessible equipment in your home to make it easy for you to move around, long term treatment of healthcare, and any other additional resources to assist you with the future physical injuries that might occur.

Now think about this example, imagine that your loved one is killed by suffering from a dangerous drug like Pradaxa or from a car accident because the airbags failed to deploy. Your spouse is now gone because of the recklessness of someone else. Your spouse was the primary breadwinner for your family. You were dependent on their income to take care of the household. Is it fair to have enough compensation for your pain & suffering to be without the one you love? Or is it enough to make up for the loss of income your loved one would have continued to make if they had not died?

Did You Know?
Our attorneys have won hundreds of defective product cases. Call us today to discuss your case.

What is Next?
There are practical limitations to obtaining these types of results. By hiring an experienced attorney from our law firm, you will be afforded the highest quality of legal services possible. The attorneys at Our Law Office have been successfully fighting to provide our clients with the adequate compensation that they deserve for over two decades. Our attorneys understand that your life will never be the same after the accident and enough compensation might not be enough. However, our attorneys will ensure that with the devotion of their time and dedication to your needs, the compensation awarded to you will be enough. Contact our office to discuss your legal matter further.

=================gtg

Personal Injury Lawyers – How Much Does a Products Liability Case Cost?

What Costs Can I Expect When Filing a Products Liability Lawsuit?
People are always inquiring about how much it would cost to pursue a products liability lawsuit. This is not a strange question because a lot of people are reasonably concerned that this type of lawsuit would be cost-prohibitive and that they would not be able to be compensated accordingly for their losses. One of the main concerns centers on the idea that attorneys’ fees would end up being out of control. However, that is not the case and the purpose of this article is to address these concerns. As you will discover that in reality, the risk for you as the injured party is fairly low.

What Does Our Law Office Charge for a Products Liability Lawsuit?
Our law firm works exclusively off of a contingency fee arrangement in products liability cases. A contingency fee arrangement basically means that we charge you nothing at all straight off the bat. In the event that your case ends up being successful then we will take a portion of the proceeds that are received as compensation for our services. Therefore, if you don’t get paid neither do we. Essentially, if your lawsuit is not successful then we will receive nothing at all for our time and services.

Moreover, we assume all financial risks. Our attorneys will invest hundreds or even thousands of hours into a case even though we may not receive anything for our efforts. As previously stated, the way that we get paid is that we keep a percentage of your award in the event that your lawsuit reaches a favorable outcome, but only if the case is successful.

The typical price range for fees rendered under a contingency fee arrangement is one-third of the winnings. However, there are certain situations where the fees may be higher if the circumstances make the case riskier for our firm. For instance, if you hire us the day before your statute of limitations expires. We may still choose to take your case but considering that time is of the essence in that situation, a higher fee may be appropriate in order for our firm to be adequately compensated proportionate to the risk we are assuming.

Costs
In addition to fees, clients will have to repay any costs that we put into a case. Some clients prefer to pay for court costs out of their own pocket, and when the case is resolved they simply pay us for our attorney’s fees alone. But when a client cannot afford to pay out of pocket for attorneys fees, we will pay the client’s court costs for them and well be paid back out of the winnings. For instance, in the event that a settlement agreement is not a possibility, we will file suit on your behalf and take your case to trial. In doing so we will have to pay the court a few hundred dollars for the filing fee and we will have to pay for other such expenses including the services of a court reporter and a process server.

The way it works is that we will advance our own money to pay for these expenses in order for your lawsuit to progress. If and only if we win your case for you will you have to reimburse us for these expenses. In the event that we do not win the case, we will completely absorb the loss of all of the attorney time and expenses that we put into your case. This is an incredibly rare outcome and should only occur if the defendant that we file suit against happens to enter into bankruptcy or some other unanticipated event. Nevertheless, if this occurs we will bear the financial burden of the loss. You will suffer no out-of-pocket expenses whatsoever.
A vast majority of cases that our firm handles are capable of being settled out of court without having to file suit, which eliminates the need to put expenses into a case.

Why You Shouldnt Be Scared of Costs
We are bound by the ethics rules of the State Bar of Texas, and just so we’re clear, that means that if we break said ethics rules we may forever be barred from the practice of law (read: we don’t break the rules). One of the rules that we are sworn to abide by is that we cannot unfairly charge a client for costs. We cant charge interest and we can only ask a client to reimburse us for costs out of their winnings and only when we substantiate the costs to the client.

The costs that we expend to make sure you have a strong case for recovery are usually fairly insignificant compared to the award that will be received if we are successful with your claim. For instance, our firm recently resolved a seven-figure truck accident case and the total expenses that we put into the case after a year of litigation was only $15,000. Now, $15,000 is not a small amount, but compared to the money that we made for our clients and the advantage it gave to our clients, it was put to good use.

What Are Some Typical Costs Associated With Filing a Lawsuit?
An example of costs or expenses would include the filing fee that we have to pay to file a lawsuit. This will usually be about a $400 fee for a court reporter to appear on the day of trial or depositions. In addition, with a products liability lawsuit, your case will likely require and report from an expert witness (typically an engineer). Hiring an expert witness to provide testimony to make sure you have all the proof you need to win could range from $2,000 to $20,000.

In sum, the attorneys at Our Law Office are highly qualified and have more than the necessary experience to ensure that your products liability lawsuit is based on the best theory of recovery available. We can state without reservation that what we bring to the table is worth every penny that we charge. We are the first to admit that hiring a lawyer is not exactly cheap, but it is better than the alternative. Attempting to pursue a product liability cause of action without an attorney would be a near impossible feat. Considering the highly technical nature of these types of lawsuits, you need the best representation available. That is exactly what we can offer you at Our Law Office.

We have been handling personal injury lawsuits all over the state of Texas for upwards of twenty years and will provide you with the same customer satisfaction that we have with every client we have represented in the past. To discuss your potential product liability cause of action, contact us.

======================gtg

Personal Injury Lawyers – County Court vs. Federal Court

Do You Know Whether You Should File Your Case in Federal Court or in the Local County Court System?
There are many different courts in the County that you could potentially file your case in. Determining which court to file your case in depends on different factors like what type of case it is and what legal remedy you are trying to pursue. However, there are also times when you will be able to file your case in federal court. Our Law Office has over twenty years of experience and has handled over a thousand cases.

The County Justice of the Peace courts are the lowest level of courts and basically serve as a small claims court. When you are suing someone and are claiming damages that are $200 or less, they must be filed in this court. However, you can also file claims up to $10,000 in this court. One of the types of cases you can file in a justice of the peace court is a personal injury claim, so long as the damages requested are less than $10,000. You need to file a personal injury claim within two years of the action that gave rise to your claim.

County Probate Court
A County Probate Court is a court that generally deals with probate matters like the distribution of a will. However, certain cases involving personal injury claims can also be brought in front of a probate court. For example, a wrongful death suit that involves survival damages can be brought in a probate court by the victim’s estate on behalf of the victim.

County District Court
The County District Courts are courts that have what is called general jurisdiction, meaning that most cases are going to be filed here. Any case that involves damages in an amount greater than $200 can be filed in one of the District courts, depending on where the incident occurred and where the parties reside. There is no upper limit to the amount of damages that can be awarded by a district court. Most personal injury cases will be filed in district court and must be done so within 2 years of the action that gave rise to the claim.

When Would I Be Able To File My Claim in Federal Court?
There are certain instances where you will be able to file your claim in Federal District Court instead of a County Court. The way you should think of it is you are always able to file your case in a County Court, but you need to be able to prove that you are allowed to file your case in Federal Court. There are two requirements that must be met in order to file a case in Federal Court, the amount in controversy and diversity of citizenship.

The amount in controversy for a case to be filed in Federal Court is $75,000. In other words, if the amount of damages you are claiming in your personal injury case is more than $75,000, then you may have the option to file your case in Federal Court if the next requirement is met.

Diversity of citizenship means that the two opposing parties, the plaintiff and the defendant, are not from the same jurisdiction, or state. For example, if you are a Texas Citizen, and are in a car accident with someone who is a citizen of Louisiana, if you decided to bring suit against them diversity of citizenship would exist. If both of these requirements are met, then you will be able to file your case in Federal Court.

You Need An Experienced Attorney to Help You Pick The Right Court
Determining the right court to file your potential claim in can be difficult without the assistance of an experienced attorney. The attorneys at Our Law Office have over two decades of experience and have helped many of their clients determine the right Court to file their claim in.

================gtg

Defective Boats and Watercraft

Has a Defective Boat or Personal Watercraft Caused an Accident or Other Serious Injury?
Boating accidents can happen more frequently than you think. Sometimes this is caused by operator error but other times it is caused by a defect in the boat itself. When a boating accident is caused by a defect in the boat and you are injured as a result, there may be a way for you to receive compensation for your injuries. Our Law Office has over two decades of experience helping clients understand and use their rights.

What is a Defect?
There are three main ways that something can be defective. They can be defective as manufactured, defective as designed or have a warning defect. The two most common types of defects for boats and other watercraft are design defects and the absence of a warning.
A design defect means that the entire line of products is defective because of a faulty design. For example, if a boat uses a certain kind of motor, and that entire line of motors has a tendency to overheat and explode, this would be a design defect.

The other kind of defect commonly associated with boats and watercraft is an absence of a warning. This kind of defect is split into two categories, an inadequate warning and a lack of a warning. An inadequate warning is a warning that does not disclose all of the risks associated with a product. A lack of a warning is a complete lack of a warning about the danger of using a product. A warning defect can arise in boat and watercraft accident cases because boats and watercraft can be potentially dangerous if not used correctly. For instance, if a boat manufacturer does not warn you that if you drop the anchor on the right side of the boat it may cause the boat to capsize, it would be a warning defect.

What Are Some Common Types of Boat and Watercraft Defects?
There are some common types of design and warning defects in boats and watercraft. One defect is a failure of the hull of the boat. This means that the hull is made in such a way that it’s not able to protect the boat or is easily damaged. If the hull of a boat fails, this usually leads to it sinking.

Another common defect is engine failure. This means that there is something that causes the engine or motor of a boat to either malfunction or becomes destroyed. The best-case scenario is that the engine simply stops working and you are stuck. However, the worst-case scenario is that the defect causes the engine to catch fire or explode resulting in serious damage to the boat and possibly to you.

Yet another type of defect is instrument failure. For example, imagine you are driving your boat on the lake, but the boat’s depth gauge is defective and fails to warn you that you are about to enter the shallow water. As a result of the defective depth gauge, you then crash your boat on the bottom of the lake resulting in damage to your boat and injury to you.

You Need An Experienced Attorney – Defective Product Attorney
Like all product liability cases, boat and watercraft defect cases can be very complex because of all the elements that have to be satisfied in order to prove a design or warning defect. Also, there are some defenses, like misuse, that the defendant can use to try and avoid liability.

The attorneys at Our Law Office have over twenty years of experience and have dealt with many products liability cases involving boats and other watercraft. They have helped many clients determine their rights under the law and get the compensation they deserved. If you were injured in a boat or watercraft accident that was caused by a defect, call today for a free consultation.

===============gtg

Accidents Caused by Defective Tires

Has a Defective Tire or Blowout Led to an Accident Causing Injury to You or a Loved One?
Tires are infamous for being the cause of a car accident. Manufacturers have repeatedly been forced to recall tires on all types of vehicles due to some sort of defect which is likely to cause an accident that may harm you and your family. A tire can be defective due to negligent construction, faulty design, or by the way in which it was wrongfully implemented. Under the right (or rather wrong) circumstances you can suffer significant injury or, in some cases, even death. This article will explain how we expect our tires to perform, what happens when they fail to meet that expectation, who is entitled to file suit, who may be responsible for your accident and it will specifically discuss tire problems associated with SUVs.

What We Expect From Tires
The tires on your car are probably one of the most crucial aspects of your vehicle. They are the one thing that directly connects your car to the road. Your tires grip the ground when driving, turning, and stopping and if they fail to function properly, the result can be catastrophic. Every tire will eventually fail; this is inevitable. The tread on your tires will wear down over time and will, one day, need to be replaced; however, tires should function properly for a reasonable amount of time and all tires should function in a fairly similar fashion. Tires will generate consistent grip until their capacity has been exceeded, but you are generally given a judicious amount of warning up to this point by way of tire screeching.

Additionally, we expect the tire to withstand a great deal of weight we put on it. If a tire fails simply from transferring weight onto it, then the tire is not functioning adequately and is considered defective. We require tires to perform properly in varying weather conditions including very cold and extremely hot roads. If a tire does not function as expected in these foreseeable circumstances then it is likely that the tire is faulty and its inherent defect is the cause of the car accident.

What Happens When a Tire Fails?
The first thing that happens when a tire fails is that one corner of the vehicle automatically falls to the ground due to the almost instantaneous deflation. This shift in weight consequently compromises the grip of the remaining three tires. A large portion of steering a vehicle and being able to turn is reliant upon being able to transfer weight between the four wheels to effectively maneuver. Anytime one of the four tires fails, the entire car is put in danger and has a high probability of crashing.

Who Can Bring a Claim?
If one of the tires on your car failed and caused you to crash, then you and every person in your vehicle at the time of the accident have standing to file a personal injury claim. If the tire of another vehicle failed, causing it to collide with you, then you would also have standing in this situation. Basically, it does not matter whether it was your tire, or the tire of another car, if you were injured due to the defective tire, the court will allow you to bring a claim against the tire manufacturer.

Furthermore, if your loved one was killed due to a defective tire you may have the standing to file a wrongful death lawsuit against the tire manufacturer. In this instance, you were not personally or directly injured by the faulty tire; however, as a result of your loved one’s death, you have been indirectly injured by the manufacturer’s negligence and have a valid claim against the responsible company. It is important to note that when you file a wrongful death claim you are suing for your own personal damages, and not filing a suit on behalf of your deceased loved one. In contrast, a claim for survival damages is filed on behalf of your loved one for the suffering or financial loss they endured prior to succumbing to their injuries.

Who Should I Sue?
There are multiple people who may be responsible for your injuries. Who you can sue depends entirely upon what specifically caused the problem. Was the tire designed poorly? There is an engineer who designed the tire? If the tire was defective in the design, meaning that it was not balanced correctly, it called for too little or too much air for the tire then it would be considered faulty and could cause a massive car or truck accident due to this defective design. Did the manufacturer negligently produce it? This might occur if the manufacturer used the wrong material in the construction of the tire.

Or did the manufacturer install the wrong tire for the specific car? For instance, a Prius requires a very different tire than a Ford F150. If the manufacturer installed a tire that does not properly fit the car or is not strong enough to hold the weight of the car, then it could explode while you are driving it or it could become separated from the car while it is in motion. Our attorneys can help assess your accident and inspect the tire to determine which part was defective and, in turn, who is responsible.

Unique Problems With SUVs
It seems like we most often hear about tire problems in SUVs. There are continually reports on the news about horrific accidents involving SUVs that were caused by defective tires. The reason for this is largely due to the theory of weight transfer. Remember, each tire greatly impacts the transfer of weight throughout the vehicle; when one tire is compromised the balance of the car is also compromised.

With SUVs sitting much higher off the ground than other vehicles, the transfer of weight has a much greater effect on the vehicle. SUVs are heavier, they sit higher above the ground and when for example, the front right tire explodes then the entire weight of the car is suddenly thrust to the front right side of the vehicle. This is another reason why many SUVs roll over in accidents such as this. They have such a great amount of force moving in that compromised direction and the vehicle is incapable of remaining balanced.

Must I Have Personally Purchased the Tire to Have Standing?
No. Under the theory of products liability, it is irrelevant whether you personally purchased the defective product. All that matters is whether you were injured by the faulty tire. Essentially, the benefit of the purchase extends to everyone who has been harmed by the defective tire. And as mentioned above, you do not even have to be physically injured in order to file a products liability claim against the tire manufacturer. If your loved one was wrongfully killed due to this defective product, you will have standing for a wrongful death claim based on product liability.

Investigating a Defective Tire Claim
The most important aspect of investigating defective tire claims is this: WE NEED THE TIRE. Without the actual tire which we believe to be defective, we will have no proof that the specific tire in question was defective and that defect is the proximate cause of your injuries. It is also for this reason that you need to contact us immediately. The sooner you contact Our Law Office the faster we can locate the tire, preserve it as evidence, and test it for defects.

First, we will visually inspect the tire. Our attorneys are very experienced with defective tires and it is sometimes very obvious just by looking at the tire that it was faulty. Sometimes by assessing the cosmetic issues of the tire we can either confirm the defect which we believe to have caused the accident or potentially eliminate other possibilities. After a visual inspection, if we still believe your accident was the result of a faulty tire, we will then have our engineers conduct tests and thoroughly analyze the tire. After they have methodically and systematically studied every part of the tire, our expert engineers will then render an official opinion. If the engineer’s findings are favorable to your claim we will then use their findings as foundational evidence to support your claim. At that point, we will file a product liability lawsuit against the manufacturer and any other responsible parties in order to seek damages for your injuries.

After commencing a claim, our attorneys will then conduct a thorough investigation during discovery. In discovery, we will request and carefully review internal documents from the tire manufacturer, tire engineers, and car manufacturer which may prove that the responsible party had knowledge of the tire defect yet still allowed it to be put on the market. We may find reports from when the tire was in the testing stage which establish that the tire did not perform adequately and therefore was defective in design. Or we may uncover documents from the manufacturer which show that the tire should have been constructed with one specific type of material, but through our expert engineer’s inspection, we have proof that the faulty tire was constructed with inferior material proximately causing your accident.

If you have been injured or your loved one has been killed due to a car accident caused by a defective tire, Our Law Office can help you. Through our experience, we have learned many unique skills to investigating defective tires and proving your claim in court. We have a great deal of experience dealing with manufacturers and car companies which is invaluable when fighting for your compensation. We understand how these large companies work and we know how to best hold them accountable for their failures. Our Law Office has helped hundreds of families injured in car accidents and we want to help you too. We know that you and your family are probably experiencing an incredibly difficult time right now and we are confident that we can help you reach a favorable outcome in your personal injury claim. If you believe that your car accident was caused by a defective tire, call Our Law Office.

================gtg

Tier 1 Workers Comp Nonsubscriber – gtg

Related Articles

Nonsubscriber Work Injuries
Obstacles and Complicating Factors
Be Careful What You Sign
Defenses Not Allowed in a Nonsubscriber Case
Defenses Allowed in Nonsubscriber Case
The Effect of 3rd Party Liability
Employee or Independent Contractor?
Scope of Employment
Comparative Fault in a Nonsubscriber Case
Nonsubscriber Wrongful Death Cases
Employer’s Duties
Employer’s Duties
Employer’s Obligation to Provide PPE
Theories of Liability Used in Nonsubscriber Cases
All About OSHA
What is OSHA?
When Does OSHA Investigate?
What does OSHA Investigate?
OSHA Fines and Penalties
By Occupation
Safety Guidelines for Commerical Fishermen
Safety Guidelines for Product Line Workers
Safety Guidelines for Plumbers
Safety Guidelines for Concrete Workers
——————-

Personal Injury Lawyers » Nonsubscriber Work Injury Attorney

Injury and Death Claims Against Workers’ Compensation Non-subscribing Employers

=========================gtg

===========================gtg

==================gtg

  =====================gtg

 =================GTG

 =========================gtg

====================gtg

====================gtg

==================gtg

 

====================gtg

=================== gtg

 

Tier 1 Medical Malpractice – gtg

Related Articles

Medical Malpractice Overview
Getting Started
What You Need to Know About Tort Reform
Investigating a Medical Malpractice
Compensation & Plaintiff’s Duties
Determining The Value of Your Case
What is Prejudgement Interest?
Plaintiff’s Duty to Mitigate Damages
Explaining Informed Consent
What we Expect from Doctors
Standard of Care Owed by a Doctor
Duty of Care Owed by a Nurse
Standard of Care in Nursing Homes
Determining if a Doctor-Patient Relationship Exists
———————

=================gtg

==========================gtg

How Much is my Medical Malpractice Case Worth?

How to Determine the Approximate Value of Your Medical Malpractice Case

When you suffer an injury due to the negligence and carelessness of a doctor or medical professional, the consequences can be catastrophic. Often their error results in you needing further medical procedures, numerous medications, and sometimes long-term stays in the hospital. Consequently, the financial burden of being injured due to medical malpractice is often overwhelming and you will likely need to be reimbursed for your costs. Furthermore, many people who do not have insurance may be forced to wait for treatment until they can receive compensation for their injuries. Our Law Office has vast knowledge in helping people like you and our attorneys are very experienced in handling these claims.

What Kinds of Injuries Have You Suffered?

The amount you should recover is determined by the extent of the injuries you have suffered. This requires adding up all of the medical costs that you have incurred. Medical costs may include:

Charges for the number of days you stayed in the hospital
The cost of medication you were administered while in the hospital
The cost of medication you were required to take after you were discharged from the hospital
Surgeries to correct the injury
Rehabilitation
X-rays and medical tests
Follow doctor’s appointments

All of these costs can quickly add up and be absolutely overwhelming and financially crippling. And these are not all of the costs that you may incur due to your injury. It is important to consult a qualified attorney who can help you determine the total cost of your medical malpractice injury. Our team of attorneys at Our Law Office frequently handle medical malpractice claims and we are familiar with all of the intricate details in assessing total injury costs.

Has Your Injury Affected Your Ability to Work?

Many injuries result in the victim being unable to work. Sometimes this period may last just during the recovery process. In other instances, the victim is so badly injured that they are not able to return to their job following their recovery. With the assistance of a knowledgeable attorney, you may be entitled to receive compensation for lost wages during your recovery period.

Additionally, some injuries are so extreme that the victim is not capable of returning to work. Back, neck, and brain injuries resulting from medical malpractice often result in the patient being permanently disabled and unable to work. As a result, you must calculate not only the amount of money you lost from not being able to work during your recovery; you must also calculate any future damages for lost future wages.

Asking for an Appropriate Amount is Crucial to the Success of Your Claim

It is very important that you ask for the appropriate amount of damages in your claim. If you ask for too much money, large corporations and companies will often refuse to negotiate and you have the potential to receive nothing. If you ask for too little in damages, you will likely not receive the amount that you are entitled to recover. Additionally, it is very likely you are not receiving the maximum amount that the defendant is willing to pay. Determining the perfect amount to ask for in your claim can be very complex and you should always consult an attorney before you file a claim for damages. The attorneys at Our Law Office have over 20 years of experience handling medical malpractice claims. We are skilled in adding up all of your losses and identifying the right amount to ask for in your claim that will likely produce a successful outcome. To discuss your potential medical malpractice claim, contact Our Law Office.

============================gtg

How Does Prejudgment Interest Work?

What is Prejudgment Interest and How Does it Work in a Medical Malpractice Case?

If you have been injured and have chosen to file a lawsuit in order to receive damages to compensate you for your loss there may be some monetary issues you are not aware of that benefit you. One of these is prejudgment interest. This is interest that will accrue on the amount of damages award from the time that your injury occurred to the time that the final judgment is entered. Prejudgment interest can be a difficult subject to understand because it can add to your legal award and the way in which it works is very complex. In order to better understand prejudgment interest, this article will analyze the ways in which prejudgment interest works, specifically in a medical malpractice lawsuit.

What is Prejudgment Interest?

As stated previously, prejudgment interest is an amount of interest that will be added to the judgment that you receive in your medical malpractice case in the event that your receive damages. At the end of your lawsuit when you receive a judgment they will add this amount onto what you are receiving. It begins to accumulate just like interest in any other situation from the time of the initial injury or loss you suffered until the dispute is resolved.

How is Prejudgment Interest Beneficial to the Legal System and my Claim?

Prejudgment interest is beneficial to you because it is adding a greater deal of money to the amount that you will inevitably receive. Therefore, you benefit personally in your own cause of action. Moreover, the accumulation of prejudgment interest can be troublesome to the defendant in the event that they end up being unsuccessful in defending themselves against the pending lawsuit. Therefore, it speeds up the process when it comes to reaching a resolution that is beneficial to both parties as neither the plaintiff nor the defendant usually likes to sit in stressful litigation and deal with the added obligations that trial brings about. However, it should be noted that in calculating prejudgment interest, trial court judges are given a great deal of discretion.

How Does Prejudgment Interest Work in Texas?

This kind of interest is recoverable as a matter of right when there is quantifiable money due to the plaintiff and it is deemed to be payable at some identifiable date prior to a judgment being reached. In Texas, you should make a general prayer for relief to such prejudgment interest to the court. You may not have to make a specific request to receive this kind of interest if you are filing a claim that triggers some kind of statutory authorization for prejudgment interest. This is one of the many reasons why it is in your best interests to have an attorney.

If your lawsuit in medical malpractice does not allow prejudgment interest unless you indicate to the court that you wish to recover this type of financial award, then you may waive your right to this type of compensation. Furthermore, calculating the interest rate to calculate prejudgment interest can be tricky as well if the litigation goes on for an extended period of time and the interest rates change. Therefore, under Texas law, it has been established that the prejudgment interest rate should be equal to the post-judgment interest rate that was in effect at the time the judgment was handed down from the court.

This all may sound like a different language to you. This is not a bad thing, because for all intents and purposes it truly is. This is a legal mechanism by which your recovery can be increased because of the different tools at your lawyer’s disposal. It is in your best interests to have a skilled attorney deal with your medical malpractice lawsuits and ensure that your right to be given prejudgment interest is preserved. The attorneys at Our Law Office have been handling these kinds of cases for decades and are more than capable of handling yours. To discuss the particulars of your specific case, contact us.

=========================gtg

Mitigating Damages in a Medical Malpractice Case

Your Responsibility to Take Action to Avoid Further Injury Following a Medical Malpractice Incident

When you are injured by some negligent act on the part of your healthcare provider you have a right to compensation. Your right to legal remedies is based on the concept that your physician had a duty to you, they breached that duty, and this breach caused your injury. However, you may be unaware that you also have a duty as the plaintiff besides proving your cause of action. You must make sure that you do not allow any injury or condition to become aggravated and worsen because of your own conduct. In legal terms, this is referred to as ‘mitigating’ your damages.

As the plaintiff, you have a heavy burden in a medical malpractice lawsuit. The important thing to keep in mind is the fact that these healthcare providers that you will be filing suit against will be working diligently to perfect any defense to liability possible. They do not want to be forced to pay for your injuries and will use defenses such as stating that you as the plaintiff made your condition worse by failing to mitigate your damages. This would be considered an abuse of the legal system to get an unfair award of damages. This is why it is important that you have experienced and skilled attorneys fighting for you that can anticipate and negate any defenses the other side can formulate against you.

What Does it Mean to Mitigate Your Damages?

Mitigating your damages means that you need to take action following your injury to avoid any further negative impacts on your health. This is referred to frequently as the avoidable consequences rule. As the plaintiff, you have the duty to mitigate your damages through reasonable post-accident conduct. You cannot recover for any aggravation of damages that could have been avoided through the exercise of reasonable care after the legal wrong was committed by the defendant.

How Does the Avoidable Consequences Rule Impact Medical Malpractice Lawsuits?

The way in which the avoidable consequences rule interacts with medical malpractice can be illustrated through the example of when the plaintiff fails to obtain medical assistance. If you as the plaintiff fail to obtain medical assistance then your recovery will be limited in the amount of compensation they can get you. Nevertheless, even if opposing counsel attempts to claim that you aggravated the condition, with the right attorneys on your side these arguments can be defeated.

Did You Know?

We have been fighting for medical malpractice victims` rights for over 20 years. Call us to discuss your case.

Defense counsel will likely attempt to assert that you as the plaintiff had a duty to mitigate your damages by submitting to surgery where the risk would be small and the surgery’s success would be reasonably probable. However, to determine what type of surgery or treatment would be ‘reasonable’ the court will compare the cost and benefit of such treatment. There are several factors that will be evaluated. The court will look at the risk, pain, expense, effort, and probability of success. If it can be established that under the circumstance a reasonable person might decline to undergo a surgical operation, then a failure to do so would not bar you from recovering full damages.

With the right legal team fighting for you, these factors can be utilized as tools to work in your favor. That is exactly what we can do for you at Our Law Office. You have a right to be compensated and get what you deserve. However, taking these matters into your own hands may cause your lawsuit to falter under the pressure of these defenses. This is why it is absolutely to your benefit to retain attorneys that know how to handle medical malpractice cases and protect your theory of recovery against defeat. To discuss your case in greater detail, contact the attorneys at Our Law Office.

=============gtg

Medical Procedure Liability and Informed Consent

Does Giving Informed Consent for a Surgery or Medical Procedure Limit the Liability of the Doctor or Hospital?

We’ve all been to the doctor at some point in our lives, whether it be for a yearly physical or for major surgery. Whenever a doctor requests to do something to you they must ask your permission, however, their duty does not stop here. They are also required to inform you of what the surgery or test they wish to perform will consist of and any risks or side effects that are known to potentially occur as a result. It is then only after the patient is fully aware of the benefits of the surgery as well as the potential harm, that the patient can give what is referred to as informed consent. Informed consent cannot be obtained through any false or misleading information by the doctor. When an informed consent claim is made in Texas, the focus of the claim is whether a reasonable person would have elected to receive treatment in light of the associated risks. If a doctor does not receive informed consent, his performance of any operation on your person will constitute a civil battery.

What are All of the Requirements of Informed Consent?

A patient must have the capacity to make the decision to consent or not to consent.

The doctor/medical provider must divulge all the information on the tests, treatment, or operation in question, including all of the potential benefits and risks.

The patient must fully understand all relevant information.

The patient must voluntarily grant consent, without any pressure or duress.

What if I am Unable to Give Informed Consent?

Sometimes you are not able to give informed consent for a variety of reasons. These often occur when a patient is unconscious or suffering from other similar symptoms. In situations such as these, there have been exceptions created to shield the liability of doctors, these exceptions claim that the patient impliedly consents when they are unable to expressly consent. The most common exceptions are a medical emergency where medical care is necessary immediately to prevent severe or irreparable harm, incompetence where an individual is incapable of giving consent for testing or treatment.

Am I the Only Person That Can Give Informed Consent for Myself?

Parents and legal guardians of a minor child are allowed to give informed consent for the child. However, the doctors of the patient have taken into consideration the wishes of the child in recent years. Especially an older child who is mentally competent to have a say in the medical decision process. The parent making such decisions still must act in a reasonable manner when making these decisions. Courts have intervened in a few cases where parents denied consent to operate on a child when it was considered a medical necessity for such an operation to occur.

Adults can also have decision-making powers given to a third party. When determining who has the power to make such a decision you will first look to see if there was a power of attorney that was set out by an advance directive. If not then an individual’s spouse, children, or parents will give the consent for you in that order.

If you have been injured during a medical procedure and you do not believe adequate informed consent was given, contact Our Law Office. We have more than 20 years of personal injury experience and will be able to help you gain the recovery that you deserve. To set up your free consultation please call us.

=================gtg

The Hippocratic Oath and a Dr’s Standard of Care

How Does the Hippocratic Oath Apply to a Doctor’s Duty or Standard of Care?

Most people have heard of the Hippocratic Oath that doctors take when they graduate from medical school. It is described as an oath that swears that, as doctors, they will not do any harm and act in the best interest of their patients. Many people may assume that the Hippocratic Oath is a legal standard that doctors must uphold. This article will discuss common misconceptions of the Hippocratic Oath and its effect on legal interpretation.

Breakdown of the Parts of the Hippocratic Oath

The Hippocratic Oath is an oath that is derived from ancient Greece that contains quite a bit of language that is no longer applicable. The effect of the oath is nowadays more ceremonial in nature and has no true legal effect that holds doctors to a certain higher standard of care. Today, the law has set out the standard of care that doctors are expected to provide when practicing medicine. The applicable parts of the oath are:

I will share knowledge gained with fellow medical professionals.
I will help the sick and not over medicate.
I will remember that there is an art to medicine as well as science.
I will say that I don’t know or will seek the opinion of a colleague.
I will respect the privacy of my patients.
I will prevent disease whenever I can.

This is not the entire oath, but the basic point can be reached through what is provided. The oath contains no definition of the standard of care that is required to be provided to a patient. The actual oath is today treated as a goal for the practice of medicine rather than holding any legal significance.

The Standard of Care to Which Medical Professionals are Held

Each medical professional owes their patients a duty to act pursuant to a reasonable standard of care that would be provided by a reasonable physician in the same field under the same circumstances. The following example may better illustrate how a reasonable standard of care is applied to medical situations: imagine an emergency room doctor that makes a decision to amputate someone’s foot. Not only will the doctor’s decision be looked upon by a reasonable emergency room doctor on whether it was the correct decision, but also in the same time restraints that the doctor was performing under when the decision was made. The reason for this standard is that a doctor cannot be expected to make the correct decision 100% of the time. The law does not want to hold doctors liable for every mistake they may make, however, a doctor is expected to act as a reasonably prudent professional in his field at all times. This is why the standard is lowered from “100% right all the time” to acting such as a reasonable doctor would.

Changes in the Standard of Medical Care

There has been recent change in the court’s definition of acting as a reasonable prudent doctor. The standard that has been traditionally applied to regular doctors is that of a reasonable prudent doctor in their region. Specialists, such as surgeons have always been held to a national standard of reasonable care. However, as medical education has become more standard across the nation, non-specialist doctors are being held to a national standard of care as well, leaving practices of regional medicine less used.

If a doctor has breached the standard of care that he owes to you, you need to be proactive and assert your rights. The attorneys at Our Law Office are experienced in the practice of personal injury law and wish for you to join the thousands of clients that we have helped get the recovery that they deserved. Call to schedule your free consultation.

======================gtg

Duty of Care for Nurses

What are the Responsibilities and Duties Imposed on Nurses and Nursing Professionals?

When you are admitted to a hospital for medical treatment, there are standards imposed on the employees attending you that must be adhered to. These standards are not only imposed on your primary physician. They are also enforced on nurses and other hospital employees. When conduct happens to fall below these standards, there are penalties that must be imposed. This is especially the case when an injury results. If you have been injured by some negligent act by a nurse during your treatment, you have a legal right to be compensated for any damages that you have incurred.

Your cause of action for your personal injury will be in medical malpractice. Medical malpractice lawsuits are riddled with many procedural technicalities and heavy burdens of proof. This is why it is important that you speak to an attorney that knows these types of lawsuits and has experience with personal injury litigation.

What Source Determines a Nurse’s Duty of Care?

In Texas, the Nursing Practice Act sets forth the regulations that govern nurses and their specific rules and duties. It contains a number of different standards that must be adhered to by nurses in their employment. Furthermore, it defines what would be considered to be unprofessional conduct. Therefore, this act is the guidepost by which to determine whether a nurse’s actions could be considered negligent so as to constitute a violation of their duties.

Can a Nurse be Liable for my Injuries in Medical Malpractice?

The simple answer is, yes. A hospital may be held liable for the injuries that arise from the negligent performance of a duty that the hospital owes directly to the patient. Moreover, a hospital also has the duty to use reasonable care in formulating the policies and procedures that govern the hospital’s medical staff and non-physician personnel. Just as the hospital has a duty, under the Nursing Practice Act there are criteria established that create duties for nurses as well.

What Are Some Examples of Some of the Duties of Care for Nurses?

The nurse’s duty was actually established by the landmark case Lunsford v. Board of Nurse Examiners in 1983. This case established that when a nurse has known of or should have had knowledge of a situation that could place a patient in danger of being harmed they have a duty to intervene. The rationale for this is that a nurse has sufficient knowledge based on their education and experience to be able to identify the minimum standards of care and when they are being violated. Therefore, they are charged with the duty of being cognizant of any dangerous situations that a patient may be in and should intervene. The common underlying theme of a nurse’s duty of care to their patients is to ensure their client’s safety and well-being.

Furthermore, there is a mechanism called “safe harbor peer review” that is available to all nurses that allows them to request a peer review committee determination. This is something that enables a nurse to notify an authority that they find some potential assignment to be dangerous. Essentially they believe this assignment will place a patient at harm and therefore taking such an assignment would violate their duty to their patient.

If a nurse happens to violate their duties to their patients then they may be held in violation of the Nursing Practice Act or the board that governs their license-ship. Furthermore, a hospital may be found vicariously liable for the actions of their nurses if they injure their patients in violation of their duties. These are difficult medical malpractice claims and you need a lawyer that knows how to litigate these kinds of cases with ease. The attorneys at Our Law Office have handled personal injury lawsuits for over two decades which has given them the skill and experience necessary to handle your medical malpractice case. To discuss your claim in further detail, please contact us.

======================gtg

Standard of Care Required of Nursing Homes

Laws and Duties Imposed on Nursing Home or Assisted Living Facility Employees in Texas

If you currently live in a nursing home or have a loved one that lives in a nursing home then you may be unaware that there are statewide laws that govern the standards of care imposed on these institutions. Nursing home institutions are regulated by the state of Texas and there is a requirement that every licensed nursing home should provide quality care in compliance with Texas statutory law. Furthermore, a nursing home is classified as a healthcare provider under the Texas Medical Liability Act. In Texas, if you suffer some kind of injury from the treatment provided by a health care provider then your recovery will be in a medical malpractice action. This means that nursing homes have two different sets of regulations that govern them and their ability to adhere to the standards imposed on them.

The Texas Medical Liability Act and the relevant portions of the Texas Health and Safety Code can be hard to digest without the assistance of someone familiar with this legislation. For the foregoing reasons, it is necessary that you have an attorney representing you in your potential cause of action. If you or a family member has suffered an injury in a nursing home, contact skilled personal injury attorneys like those at Our Law Office to fight on your behalf.

What are the Duties Imposed on Nursing Homes?

Texas law states that a nursing home is under a duty to exercise whatever reasonable care is necessary to ensure a patient’s safety depending on his or her specific mental and physical conditions. The case Golden Villa Nursing Home Inc. vs. Smith established that there is no real general rule as to what standard would constitute reasonable care. Instead, you are to look to the specific factors of each different party’s circumstances. Moreover, while medical treatment is in the hands of the physicians at nursing homes, they must provide some level of nursing home care outside of what is expected of the doctors.

What About Employees of Nursing Homes?

Considering the laws in Texas on nursing homes, they are typically considered to be under a duty to be extremely careful and particular when hiring employees to work at their facilities. There is a duty to supervise employees to make sure that sufficient care is being provided.

What Kinds of Claims May I Bring Against a Nursing Home?

There are several different claims that you may be able to bring against a nursing home, depending on the specific facts of your case. If the conduct that caused the injury was due to some violation of some ordinance or statute that nursing homes must abide by then you may have a claim in negligence. Furthermore, you may have a tort action for negligence against the nursing home, assuming that you are able to meet the necessary elements of a negligence claim. There may be a claim against the nursing home for vicarious liability for the actions of an employee of the nursing home that injures you. In that type of claim, you are holding the nursing home liable for the actions of their employee. In each of these different types of claims, there are different elements that must be met in order for your claim to be successful.

For the reasons listed above, it is very important that you retain legal representation to litigate your claim against a nursing home. The fact that nursing homes are classified as health care providers on the Texas Medical Liability Act means that there are statutory elements to your claim as well as other governing laws. In order to ensure that no stone is left unturned, it is in your best interests to make sure you have an attorney that has handled claims like this in the past. The attorneys at Our Law Office have been dealing with personal injury lawsuits for over two decades and are prepared to evaluate your case for you. To discuss your case, please contact us.

========================gtg

When Does a Doctor-Patient Relationship Exist?

How to Determine if a Doctor-Patient Relationship Existed in Your Case

Almost everyone has been to the doctor at some point in their life. From the time we are newborns until our ultimate death a doctor is a person that we often look at as a trustworthy individual. The relationship between a doctor and a patient is a special one; certain rules are set in place to establish when the relationship is created. These rules are set in place to protect doctors from potential liability from people that presume they are patients of the doctor.

Certain standards must be met before an individual can be considered the patient of a doctor. If you have been injured by a doctor or hurt as a result of the inaccurate advice that they may have given you, you may have a medical malpractice claim. In these situations, you need an experienced attorney to assert your rights. The attorneys at Our Law Office bring a wealth of knowledge in every aspect of the personal injury law field. We have a well-earned reputation in the legal community for getting positive results for our clients; we may be able to help you too.

What is Required to Form a Doctor-Patient Relationship?

A doctor-patient relationship is said to begin when a doctor accepts or renders aid to a patient. Although you may think this is a simple concept the opposite is true. Courts and creative attorneys have found various ways to interpret the terms.

The terms “accept” and “render aid”, make this a complex issue. While some people may believe that it begins when they visit a doctor, it actually starts before this. The courts have determined that a doctor-patient relationship exists when the physician has created some form of payment arrangement with the patient.

Doctors may give you medical advice even though you are not their patient; this does not create a doctor-patient relationship between you and the doctor. An example of medical advice being given without forming a doctor-patient relationship is if your friend or relative is a physician and you ask them for their medical opinion, they may give you advice and not be subject to the potential liability that a doctor-patient relationship holds.

Can I Sue for Medical Malpractice if a Doctor-Patient Relationship is Not Found to Have Existed?

In a word, no, you may not sue a doctor for medical malpractice. In order to have a viable medical malpractice suit a medical professional must have had a duty to provide you competent medical care. Doctors do not inherently have this duty with every individual they meet just because of their status as a doctor; they only have this duty for their patients. If a doctor-patient relationship never formed the doctor would owe you no duty and thus be unable to commit any medical practice action upon you.

Not all cases are treated the same and there is no one way to define the creation of a physician-patient relationship. We can help make your case if the creation of this relationship is called into question. Call us to schedule your free consultation with one of our attorneys. We have helped thousands of clients recover the damages that they deserve and we can help you too.

===============gtg