CS-Auto Accident SA- support pages.

———–=============================

Meta Title: Texas Comparative Fault in Car Accidents — How Shared Blame Affects Your Claim

Meta Description: San Antonio car accident lawyers explain how Texas comparative fault law works. Learn why being partially at fault does not eliminate your right to compensation after a crash.


How Does Texas Comparative Fault Law Affect Your Car Accident Claim?

After almost every car accident in San Antonio, the other driver’s insurance company will try to pin at least some of the blame on you. It does not matter that their driver ran a red light, was texting, or was speeding — the adjuster will find something. You were going a few miles over the limit. You did not brake soon enough. You should have seen them coming. This is not a coincidence. It is a deliberate strategy because Texas comparative fault law allows the insurance company to reduce what they owe you by whatever percentage of fault they can stick on you. The San Antonio car accident lawyers at Carabin Shaw have been fighting these tactics for over 34 years, and they want you to understand exactly how this system works before you accept any settlement offer.

Texas follows what is called a modified comparative fault system, spelled out in Chapter 33 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. The basic rule is simple: if you are partially at fault for a car accident, your compensation is reduced by your percentage of fault. But there is a hard cutoff. If your share of the blame reaches 51 percent or more, you recover nothing. Zero. That 51 percent bar is the line the insurance company is trying to push you across, and every argument they make about your driving is designed to move you closer to it.

Understanding how comparative fault works is one of the most important things a car accident victim in Texas can do, because this single legal concept affects the value of your case more than almost anything else. The difference between being assigned 15 percent fault and 50 percent fault on a $400,000 claim is $140,000 — and the difference between 50 percent and 51 percent is the entire $400,000.

How Percentage of Fault Is Determined

Who Decides How Much Fault You Share?

During the insurance claim process, the adjuster will assign fault percentages based on their own investigation — which is heavily biased toward their insured. They look at the police report, witness statements, photographs, and any recorded statement you gave them. If the case goes to court, a jury determines each party’s percentage of fault after hearing all the evidence. The jury’s determination is binding, and your damages are reduced accordingly. In many cases, the fault determination during settlement negotiations is where the real fight happens, because the insurance company knows most people will not go to trial.

Common Scenarios Where Fault Is Shared

Comparative fault comes up in car accident cases far more often than most people realize. A driver runs a red light and T-bones your car, but you were going 10 mph over the posted speed limit. The other driver is primarily at fault, but your speeding contributed to the severity of the impact, and a jury might assign you 10 to 20 percent of the blame. A distracted driver rear-ends you at a stoplight, but one of your brake lights was out. The other driver clearly caused the accident, but the insurance company argues your broken brake light made it harder for their driver to see that you were stopped. A driver fails to yield while making a left turn and hits you in the intersection, but you were approaching the yellow light at a high rate of speed instead of preparing to stop. Both drivers made mistakes, and a jury has to weigh which one contributed more to the crash.

In every one of these situations, the insurance company will push to maximize your share of fault. That is why having experienced car accident attorneys review the evidence matters — they know which arguments hold up and which ones fall apart under scrutiny.

How Your Compensation Is Calculated Under Comparative Fault

The math is straightforward once the percentages are set. If your total damages are $300,000 and a jury finds you 20 percent at fault, your recovery is reduced by 20 percent. You receive $240,000. If you are found 40 percent at fault, you receive $180,000. If you are found 50 percent at fault, you receive $150,000. But if that number tips to 51 percent, you get nothing. The jump from 50 to 51 is not a 1 percent reduction — it is a 100 percent loss. That is why insurance adjusters work so hard to build the case that you were more than half responsible.

The 51 Percent Bar — The Line That Kills Your Claim

Texas is not a pure comparative fault state. Some states allow you to recover even if you are 99 percent at fault, with your damages reduced accordingly. Texas does not. The moment your fault reaches 51 percent, your right to compensation disappears entirely. This is the most dangerous feature of Texas comparative fault law for accident victims, and it is the one the insurance company exploits most aggressively. Every recorded statement they ask you to give, every question about what you were doing before the crash, every request for your phone records — all of it is aimed at building a case that you were the majority at fault.

Multiple At-Fault Parties

Car accidents sometimes involve more than two vehicles, and Texas comparative fault law accounts for that. Each party involved in the crash is assigned their own percentage of fault, and the total must add up to 100 percent. If three drivers are involved and a jury assigns 60 percent to Driver A, 25 percent to Driver B, and 15 percent to you, your damages are reduced by 15 percent and you can pursue claims against both Driver A and Driver B. Each defendant is responsible for their own share of fault. Under Texas proportionate responsibility rules, a defendant who is less than 51 percent at fault typically pays only their percentage. A defendant who is 51 percent or more at fault can be held jointly liable for the full amount of economic damages.

What Evidence Fights Back Against Shared Fault Arguments

The strongest weapon against an inflated fault assignment is evidence. Cell phone records can prove the other driver was texting. The vehicle’s event data recorder — sometimes called the black box — stores speed, braking, and steering data from the seconds before the crash. Surveillance footage from nearby businesses or traffic cameras can show exactly what happened. Witness testimony from people who saw the accident can contradict the other driver’s story. Accident reconstruction experts can use physical evidence — skid marks, debris patterns, vehicle damage profiles — to determine speeds, angles of impact, and the sequence of events. And the police report, while not binding on a jury, often contains the officer’s assessment of which driver violated traffic law.

The car accident attorneys at Carabin Shaw gather and preserve this evidence from day one because once it disappears — and it disappears fast — the insurance company’s version of events is the only one left. Do not let them control the narrative. CALL SHAW at 800-862-1260 for a free consultation.

===================

Meta Title: Statute of Limitations for Car Accidents in Texas — How Long Do You Have to File?

Meta Description: San Antonio car accident attorneys explain the Texas statute of limitations for car accident lawsuits. Learn the deadlines, exceptions, and what happens if you miss the filing window.


How Long Do You Have to File a Car Accident Lawsuit in Texas?

Texas gives you two years. That is the statute of limitations for personal injury claims arising from car accidents, and it is one of the most important deadlines in your case. If you do not file a lawsuit within two years of the date of the crash, your right to compensation is gone — permanently. It does not matter how badly you were hurt, how clearly the other driver was at fault, or how much money you are owed. Miss the deadline and the court will dismiss your case. The San Antonio car accident lawyers at Carabin Shaw have watched people lose valid claims because they waited too long, and they do not want that to happen to you.

Two years sounds like a long time when you are lying in a hospital bed after a wreck on Loop 410 or I-35. But the months move fast. You are focused on surgeries, physical therapy, getting back to work, and dealing with the insurance company. The insurance adjuster is in no hurry — in fact, delay works in their favor. The longer they can string you along with lowball offers and requests for more documentation, the closer you get to the deadline. And once that two-year window closes, they do not have to pay you anything. That is why experienced car accident attorneys tell every client the same thing: do not wait.

Beyond the two-year rule, there are several important exceptions, shorter deadlines, and special circumstances that every car accident victim in Texas needs to understand. Getting these wrong can be just as costly as missing the main deadline entirely.

The Two-Year Rule — Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code Section 16.003

The general statute of limitations for personal injury claims in Texas is found in Section 16.003 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code. It applies to car accidents, truck accidents, motorcycle accidents, pedestrian accidents, and virtually every other type of crash on Texas roads. The clock starts running on the date of the accident — not the date you discovered your injuries, not the date you finished treatment, and not the date the insurance company denied your claim. The date of the crash is day one.

What Happens If You Miss the Deadline

If you attempt to file a lawsuit after the two-year statute of limitations has expired, the defendant will file a motion to dismiss, and the court will grant it. There is no grace period. There is no appeal. There is no exception for people who did not know about the deadline. The case is over. This is true even if you have overwhelming evidence that the other driver was 100 percent at fault and your injuries are catastrophic. The statute of limitations is an absolute bar, and Texas courts enforce it without exception in standard car accident cases.

The Statute of Limitations for Wrongful Death

If a family member was killed in a car accident, the wrongful death statute of limitations is also two years under Chapter 71 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code. However, the clock starts on the date of death, not the date of the crash. In most cases those are the same day, but when a victim survives the initial accident and dies days, weeks, or months later from their injuries, the distinction matters. The family has two years from the date of death to file the wrongful death claim.

Claims Involving Minors

When a child under 18 is injured in a car accident, the statute of limitations is tolled — meaning the clock is paused — until the child turns 18. At that point, the child has two years to file a lawsuit, giving them until their 20th birthday. A parent or legal guardian can also file a claim on the child’s behalf at any time before the child turns 18. This tolling provision exists because the law recognizes that minors cannot make legal decisions for themselves and should not lose their rights because a parent failed to act in time.

Claims Against the Government — The 6-Month Notice Deadline

This is where many car accident victims get blindsided. If your crash was caused by a government entity — a City of San Antonio vehicle, a TxDOT maintenance truck, a Bexar County Sheriff’s deputy, a VIA bus, or a highway defect that a government agency failed to repair — special rules apply under the Texas Tort Claims Act. You must provide formal written notice of your claim to the government entity within six months of the accident. Six months, not two years. If you fail to provide this notice, your claim against the government can be barred even though the standard two-year statute of limitations has not yet expired.

This shorter deadline catches people off guard all the time. A driver is rear-ended by a city maintenance truck on US 281. They spend the first four months recovering from surgery and physical therapy. By the time they contact a lawyer, the six-month notice window is almost closed or already gone. Government liability cases require immediate legal attention because the notice deadline is unforgiving.

The Discovery Rule — A Narrow Exception

In very limited circumstances, Texas courts apply what is called the discovery rule, which delays the start of the statute of limitations until the injured person knew or should have known about their injury. This exception rarely applies to car accident cases because the injury is usually apparent immediately — you were in a crash, you were hurt, you know about it. The discovery rule is more commonly applied in medical malpractice or toxic exposure cases where the injury is hidden. However, there are rare car accident scenarios where a latent injury — such as a slow brain bleed or a hairline fracture that was missed on initial imaging — does not manifest until well after the crash. If you discover a previously unknown injury months after your accident, talk to a car accident lawyer immediately to determine whether the discovery rule extends your filing window.

The Statute of Limitations Does Not Pause for Insurance Negotiations

This is one of the most dangerous misconceptions car accident victims have. Many people believe that because they are actively negotiating with the insurance company, the statute of limitations is on hold. It is not. The clock runs continuously from the date of the crash, regardless of what is happening with your insurance claim. The insurance company knows this. They will happily negotiate with you right up to the deadline, and if the clock runs out before you file a lawsuit, they have no legal obligation to pay you anything. They can walk away. This is not a hypothetical — it happens.

Filing a Lawsuit Is Not the Same as Settling

Filing a lawsuit within the two-year window does not mean your case goes straight to trial. The vast majority of car accident cases in Texas settle before trial. Filing the lawsuit preserves your legal rights and puts the insurance company on notice that you are serious. Settlement negotiations can and do continue after a lawsuit is filed. In fact, many cases settle faster once the other side knows they are facing an actual courtroom date rather than an informal claim they can drag out indefinitely.

Why You Should Not Wait

Even though you have two years, waiting works against you in every way. Physical evidence at the crash scene is cleaned up within hours. Surveillance footage from nearby businesses is overwritten within 48 to 72 hours. Witnesses forget details and move away. The other driver’s vehicle may be repaired or scrapped, destroying the physical evidence of the impact. Your own medical records are strongest when treatment begins immediately after the crash — gaps in treatment give the insurance company ammunition to argue your injuries are not that serious. And if your case involves a government entity, you have only six months to provide notice.

The car accident attorneys at Carabin Shaw start investigating on day one, preserve evidence before it disappears, and make sure no deadline is missed. Consultations are free and there is no fee unless they win. CALL SHAW at 800-862-1260.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.